Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

HISTORICAL ACTION AND NARRATIVE IN THE CONTEXT OF HISTORIOGRAPHY IN RICOEUR AND RANCIERE

Year 2024, Issue: 37, 117 - 134, 07.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.53844/flsf.1430127

Abstract

The argument of this study is that a critical encounter between the ‘historiographical’ texts of Ricoeur and Rancière on the theme of historical action and narrative provides us with a fruitful approach to the political stakes of the act of writing history. More specifically, I claim that attention to how these two authors frame narrative agency in the construction of our identities in history reveals two points of salience that give orientation to our attitude toward history, namely, disruption and harmony. Framing history as a problem in this way makes visible the centrality of how to conceive agency within the two poles of modern existence: on the one hand, statistical regularities that govern behavior in the form of impersonal forces and, on the other, individual projects, the trajectories of which form a coherent life (and define autonomy for the subject). The merit of narrative history is to bridge these poles; but it thereby occludes the antagonisms characteristic of modernity. It is in order to make these visible that we need a disruptive attention to the way narratives are constructed retrospectively.

References

  • Aron, Raymond. History, Truth, Liberty: Selected Writings of Raymond Aron. First Edition. Chicago: Universty of Chicago Press, 1986.
  • Balibar, Etienne. Masses, Classes, Ideas. New York London: Routledge, 1994.
  • Braudel, Fernand. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, Vol. 1. VOLUME 1. University of California Press, 1996.
  • Dosse, Francois, and Deborah Glassman. History of Structuralism; The Rising Sign 1945 1966. University of Minnesota Press, 1998.
  • Hacking, Ian. Historical Ontology. Harvard University Press, 2004.
  • ———. Rewriting the Soul. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.
  • Hassner, Pierre. ‘Raymond Aron and the History of the Twentieth Century’. International Studies Quarterly 29, no. 1 (1985): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600477.
  • Janicka, Iwona. ‘Who Can Speak? Rancière, Latour and the Question of Articulation’. Humanities 9, no. 4 (December 2020): 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9040123.
  • Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • Lightfoot, Cynthia, Michael Chandler, and Chris Lalonde. Changing Conceptions of Psychological Life. Psychology Press, 2004.
  • Mallier, Clara. ‘Tenses in Translation: Benveniste’s “Discourse” and “Historical Narration” in the First-Person Novel’. Language and Literature 23, no. 3 (1 August 2014): 244–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947014536507.
  • Mouzakitis, Angelos. ‘From Narrative to Action: Paul Ricoeur’s Reflections on History’. Rethinking History 19, no. 3 (3 July 2015): 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2014.901654.
  • Quintana, Laura. The Politics of Bodies: Philosophical Emancipation with and Beyond Rancière. Rowman & Littlefield, 2020.
  • Ranciere, Jacques. Names of History: On the Poetics of Knowledge. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.
  • Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative: Volume I. Translated by Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer. The University of Chicago Press, 2012.
  • Veyne, Paul. Writing History: Essay on Epistemology. Middletown, Conn, The Wesleyan University Press 1984. White, Hayden. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.

RICOEUR VE RANCIERE'İN TARİHYAZIMINDA TARİHSEL EYLEMSELLİK VE ANLATI

Year 2024, Issue: 37, 117 - 134, 07.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.53844/flsf.1430127

Abstract

Ricoeur ve Rancière’in tarihyazımsal metinlerinin eleştirel bir şekilde ve tarihsel eylemsellik ve anlatı kavramlarına vurgu yaparak birlikte okunması, tarihyazımının siyasal önemini göstermektedir. İki yazarın anlatısal eylemselliğin tarih içinde kimliklerin inşasındaki rolüne yaklaşımı, tarihe dair oryantasyonumuzu belirleyen iki öğeyi, parçalanmayı ve uyumu, görünür kılmaktadır. Tarihi bu şekilde bir problem olarak tasvir etmek ise, eylemselliği modern yaşamın bu hususta iki temel kutbu arasında nasıl konumlandırdığımızın önemini vurgulamaktadır: davranışı, kişisiz toplumsal kuvvetler olarak belirleyen istatistiksel düzenlilikler ve gelişimleri uyumlu bir yaşamı oluşturan ve birey için otonomiyi vurgulayan kişisel tasarılar. Modern yaşamın barındırdığı çatışmaları görünür kılmak adına, anlatıların ‘geriye dönük’ inşasına dikkatimizi vermemiz gerekir.

References

  • Aron, Raymond. History, Truth, Liberty: Selected Writings of Raymond Aron. First Edition. Chicago: Universty of Chicago Press, 1986.
  • Balibar, Etienne. Masses, Classes, Ideas. New York London: Routledge, 1994.
  • Braudel, Fernand. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, Vol. 1. VOLUME 1. University of California Press, 1996.
  • Dosse, Francois, and Deborah Glassman. History of Structuralism; The Rising Sign 1945 1966. University of Minnesota Press, 1998.
  • Hacking, Ian. Historical Ontology. Harvard University Press, 2004.
  • ———. Rewriting the Soul. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.
  • Hassner, Pierre. ‘Raymond Aron and the History of the Twentieth Century’. International Studies Quarterly 29, no. 1 (1985): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600477.
  • Janicka, Iwona. ‘Who Can Speak? Rancière, Latour and the Question of Articulation’. Humanities 9, no. 4 (December 2020): 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9040123.
  • Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • Lightfoot, Cynthia, Michael Chandler, and Chris Lalonde. Changing Conceptions of Psychological Life. Psychology Press, 2004.
  • Mallier, Clara. ‘Tenses in Translation: Benveniste’s “Discourse” and “Historical Narration” in the First-Person Novel’. Language and Literature 23, no. 3 (1 August 2014): 244–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947014536507.
  • Mouzakitis, Angelos. ‘From Narrative to Action: Paul Ricoeur’s Reflections on History’. Rethinking History 19, no. 3 (3 July 2015): 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2014.901654.
  • Quintana, Laura. The Politics of Bodies: Philosophical Emancipation with and Beyond Rancière. Rowman & Littlefield, 2020.
  • Ranciere, Jacques. Names of History: On the Poetics of Knowledge. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.
  • Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative: Volume I. Translated by Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer. The University of Chicago Press, 2012.
  • Veyne, Paul. Writing History: Essay on Epistemology. Middletown, Conn, The Wesleyan University Press 1984. White, Hayden. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Philosophy of History, Contemporary Philosophy
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Ali Özgür Gürsoy 0000-0003-3332-9921

Publication Date May 7, 2024
Submission Date February 1, 2024
Acceptance Date March 14, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Issue: 37

Cite

Chicago Gürsoy, Ali Özgür. “HISTORICAL ACTION AND NARRATIVE IN THE CONTEXT OF HISTORIOGRAPHY IN RICOEUR AND RANCIERE”. FLSF Felsefe Ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 37 (May 2024): 117-34. https://doi.org/10.53844/flsf.1430127.

Starting from 2024, our journal will be published in 3 issues as two regular and one special issues. These issues will be published In May (regular issue), September (special issue) and December (regular issue).

Acceptance of articles for our special issue and our regular issue in December will begin on March 15.

Only articles within the scope of the file will be included in our special issue. 

Thank you for your attention.