Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2019, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 113 - 126, 21.07.2019

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Aktel, M. (2001). Küreselleşme Süreci ve Etki Alanları. Süleyman Demi-rel üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 2, 193-202.
  • Bauman, Z. (2013). Globalization: The Human Consequences. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bauman, Z. (2014). Küreselleşme. (A. Yılmaz, Trans.) İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Blutstein, H. (2015). The Ascent of Globalisation. Manchester: Manches-ter University Press.
  • Culler, J. D. (1986). Ferdinand de Saussure. New York: Cornell Universi-ty Press.
  • Cohen, R. S. (1994). The Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Connell, R. W. (1977). Ruling Class, Ruling Culture. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
  • Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender Society, 19(829), 829-859.
  • Coser, L. (2007). Conflict and Critical Theories. In K. Allan, The Social Lens: An Invitation to Social and Sociological Theory (pp. 221-241). USA: Pine Forge Press.
  • dictionary.cambridge.org. (2017, 09 13). Sustainability. Retrieved 09 13, 2017, from dictionary.cambridge.org: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sustainability?fallbackFrom=turkish
  • dictionary.cambridge.org. (2018, June 04). imperialism. Retrieved June 04, 2018, from dictionary.cambridge.org: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/imperialism
  • dictionary.com. (2018, June 03). concept. Retrieved June 03, 2018, from dictionary.com: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/concept
  • Fauzi , H., Svensson , G., & Rahman , A. A. (2010). Triple Bottom Line” as “Sustainable Corporate Performance”: A Proposition for the Future. Sustaina-bility, 1345-1360.
  • Freud, S. (2018). A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. Digital publi-cation: PDFbooksworld.
  • Friedman, M. (1970). Corporate social responsibility and business ethics. Retrieved 10 30, 2017, from saylordotorg.github.io: https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_government-regulation-and-the-legal-environment-of-business/s05-corporate-social-responsibilit.html
  • Hardach, G. (1981). The First World War, 1914-1918. Berkley&Los An-geles: University of California Press.
  • Jacoby, N. H. (1973). Corporate Power and Social Responsibility. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Jong, J. (2011). World History: A Brief Introduction. (S. Jalagin, S. Tavera, & A. Dilley, Eds.) Lungarno Pacinotti: Pisa University Press.
  • Knowles, V. (2014, March 25). What’s the difference between CSR and sustainability? Retrieved June 03, 2018, from 2degreesnetwork.com: https://www.2degreesnetwork.com/groups/2degrees-community/resources/whats-difference-between-csr-and-sustainability/
  • Kumar, K. (2009). From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society: New Theories of the Contemporary World. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Levitt, T. (1983, MayJune). The Globalisation of Markets. Harvard Busi-ness Review, 61(3), 92-102.
  • Lloyd, J. (2001). The Protest Ethic: How the Anti-globalisation Movement Challenges Social Democracy. London: Demos.
  • Mattelart, A. (1994). Mapping World Communication: War, Progress, Culture. (E. Susan, & C. A. Cohen, Trans.) London: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Mattelart, A. (2016). İletişimin dünyasallaşması . (H. Yücel, Trans.) İstan-bul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Pieterse, J. N. (2010). Development Theory. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Pin, D. F. (2004). How Tesla Integrates Shared Value Principles with Ecosystem Innovation to Build Sustainable Competitive Advantage. (F. Zirpoli, Ed.) Venezia: Unşversita Ca'Foscari Venezia.
  • Polat , H. M. (2012). Küreselleşen Kalkınma. İstanbul: Açılım Kitap.
  • Saussure, F. (2006). Writings in General Linguistics. Oxford : Oxford University Press. Schönherr, N., Findler, F., & Martinuzzi, A. (2017). Exploring the Inter-face of CSR and the Sustainable Development Goals. Transnational Corpora-tions, 24(3), 33-47.
  • Smith, A. (2007). Wealth of Nations. 2016: Metalibri.
  • Smith, J. (2016). Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century: Globalization, Super-Exploitation, and Capitalism’s Final Crisis. New York: NYU Press.
  • Türkman, A. K. (2017, 07 03). KSS yalanını bırakın, gerçeklerle yüzleşin: Geleceği Şirketler kurtacak. Retrieved 01 16, 2018, from thebrandage.com: http://www.thebrandage.com/kss-yalanini-birakin-gerceklerle-yuzlesin-dunyayi-sirketler-kurtaracak
  • UN. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. United Nations. New York: United Nations General Assembly.
  • Voiculescu, A. (2011). Human Rights and the Normative Ordering of Global Capitalism. In A. Voiculescu, & H. Yanacopulos, The business of human rights (pp. 10-28). London: Zed Books.
  • Voiculescu, A., & Yanacopulos, H. (2011). Human Rights in Business context: An Overview. In A. Voiculescu, & H. Yanacopulos, The Business of Human Rights (pp. 1-9). London: Zed Books.
  • WCED. (1987). Our common future. Oslo: WCED.
  • Williams, O. F. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Business in Sustainable Development. New York: Routledge.
  • Yaylagül, L. (2010). Kitle İletişim Kuramları. Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları.

RISE OF SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT WHILE GLOBALISATION AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CONCEPTS ARE DEVALUATED

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 113 - 126, 21.07.2019

Öz

The emergence of new concepts is the inevitable consequence of the changing social relations. Social relations are in continuous change. Thus, new concepts are continuously generated to define the new social relations and guide the socie-ty. Continuous change demand of the society is addressed as the continuous cri-sis of the liberalism. As long the communication has been one of the fundamen-tal instrument of this crisis management, the concepts by which the sovereign messages are let to societies are the interest of research area of the communica-tion studies. Sustainability concept, which has been declared as the leading con-cept of the new millennium by Kofi Annan, attracts attentions in this term. With the rising popularity of sustainability concept, the globalisation and the corporate social responsibility (CSR) concepts, which were the tools of the defining the world of the previous century have started to be excluded. One of the most im-portant reason of this consequence is the values of CRS and globalisation’s con-flicting with the represented values of the sustainability. In this study, historical evolvement process of these concepts will be examined in terms of their new emerging meanings and social relations. The facts of decrease of the CSR and the globalisations concepts in value while sustainability concept increase will be examined. In conclusion point of differences of the sustainability concept will be identified. 

Kaynakça

  • Aktel, M. (2001). Küreselleşme Süreci ve Etki Alanları. Süleyman Demi-rel üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 2, 193-202.
  • Bauman, Z. (2013). Globalization: The Human Consequences. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bauman, Z. (2014). Küreselleşme. (A. Yılmaz, Trans.) İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Blutstein, H. (2015). The Ascent of Globalisation. Manchester: Manches-ter University Press.
  • Culler, J. D. (1986). Ferdinand de Saussure. New York: Cornell Universi-ty Press.
  • Cohen, R. S. (1994). The Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Connell, R. W. (1977). Ruling Class, Ruling Culture. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
  • Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender Society, 19(829), 829-859.
  • Coser, L. (2007). Conflict and Critical Theories. In K. Allan, The Social Lens: An Invitation to Social and Sociological Theory (pp. 221-241). USA: Pine Forge Press.
  • dictionary.cambridge.org. (2017, 09 13). Sustainability. Retrieved 09 13, 2017, from dictionary.cambridge.org: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sustainability?fallbackFrom=turkish
  • dictionary.cambridge.org. (2018, June 04). imperialism. Retrieved June 04, 2018, from dictionary.cambridge.org: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/imperialism
  • dictionary.com. (2018, June 03). concept. Retrieved June 03, 2018, from dictionary.com: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/concept
  • Fauzi , H., Svensson , G., & Rahman , A. A. (2010). Triple Bottom Line” as “Sustainable Corporate Performance”: A Proposition for the Future. Sustaina-bility, 1345-1360.
  • Freud, S. (2018). A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. Digital publi-cation: PDFbooksworld.
  • Friedman, M. (1970). Corporate social responsibility and business ethics. Retrieved 10 30, 2017, from saylordotorg.github.io: https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_government-regulation-and-the-legal-environment-of-business/s05-corporate-social-responsibilit.html
  • Hardach, G. (1981). The First World War, 1914-1918. Berkley&Los An-geles: University of California Press.
  • Jacoby, N. H. (1973). Corporate Power and Social Responsibility. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Jong, J. (2011). World History: A Brief Introduction. (S. Jalagin, S. Tavera, & A. Dilley, Eds.) Lungarno Pacinotti: Pisa University Press.
  • Knowles, V. (2014, March 25). What’s the difference between CSR and sustainability? Retrieved June 03, 2018, from 2degreesnetwork.com: https://www.2degreesnetwork.com/groups/2degrees-community/resources/whats-difference-between-csr-and-sustainability/
  • Kumar, K. (2009). From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society: New Theories of the Contemporary World. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Levitt, T. (1983, MayJune). The Globalisation of Markets. Harvard Busi-ness Review, 61(3), 92-102.
  • Lloyd, J. (2001). The Protest Ethic: How the Anti-globalisation Movement Challenges Social Democracy. London: Demos.
  • Mattelart, A. (1994). Mapping World Communication: War, Progress, Culture. (E. Susan, & C. A. Cohen, Trans.) London: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Mattelart, A. (2016). İletişimin dünyasallaşması . (H. Yücel, Trans.) İstan-bul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Pieterse, J. N. (2010). Development Theory. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Pin, D. F. (2004). How Tesla Integrates Shared Value Principles with Ecosystem Innovation to Build Sustainable Competitive Advantage. (F. Zirpoli, Ed.) Venezia: Unşversita Ca'Foscari Venezia.
  • Polat , H. M. (2012). Küreselleşen Kalkınma. İstanbul: Açılım Kitap.
  • Saussure, F. (2006). Writings in General Linguistics. Oxford : Oxford University Press. Schönherr, N., Findler, F., & Martinuzzi, A. (2017). Exploring the Inter-face of CSR and the Sustainable Development Goals. Transnational Corpora-tions, 24(3), 33-47.
  • Smith, A. (2007). Wealth of Nations. 2016: Metalibri.
  • Smith, J. (2016). Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century: Globalization, Super-Exploitation, and Capitalism’s Final Crisis. New York: NYU Press.
  • Türkman, A. K. (2017, 07 03). KSS yalanını bırakın, gerçeklerle yüzleşin: Geleceği Şirketler kurtacak. Retrieved 01 16, 2018, from thebrandage.com: http://www.thebrandage.com/kss-yalanini-birakin-gerceklerle-yuzlesin-dunyayi-sirketler-kurtaracak
  • UN. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. United Nations. New York: United Nations General Assembly.
  • Voiculescu, A. (2011). Human Rights and the Normative Ordering of Global Capitalism. In A. Voiculescu, & H. Yanacopulos, The business of human rights (pp. 10-28). London: Zed Books.
  • Voiculescu, A., & Yanacopulos, H. (2011). Human Rights in Business context: An Overview. In A. Voiculescu, & H. Yanacopulos, The Business of Human Rights (pp. 1-9). London: Zed Books.
  • WCED. (1987). Our common future. Oslo: WCED.
  • Williams, O. F. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Business in Sustainable Development. New York: Routledge.
  • Yaylagül, L. (2010). Kitle İletişim Kuramları. Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları.
Toplam 37 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Zeliha Oçak

Yayımlanma Tarihi 21 Temmuz 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Oçak, Z. (2019). RISE OF SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT WHILE GLOBALISATION AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CONCEPTS ARE DEVALUATED. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences, 3(1), 113-126.
AMA Oçak Z. RISE OF SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT WHILE GLOBALISATION AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CONCEPTS ARE DEVALUATED. IJSHS. Temmuz 2019;3(1):113-126.
Chicago Oçak, Zeliha. “RISE OF SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT WHILE GLOBALISATION AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CONCEPTS ARE DEVALUATED”. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences 3, sy. 1 (Temmuz 2019): 113-26.
EndNote Oçak Z (01 Temmuz 2019) RISE OF SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT WHILE GLOBALISATION AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CONCEPTS ARE DEVALUATED. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences 3 1 113–126.
IEEE Z. Oçak, “RISE OF SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT WHILE GLOBALISATION AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CONCEPTS ARE DEVALUATED”, IJSHS, c. 3, sy. 1, ss. 113–126, 2019.
ISNAD Oçak, Zeliha. “RISE OF SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT WHILE GLOBALISATION AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CONCEPTS ARE DEVALUATED”. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences 3/1 (Temmuz 2019), 113-126.
JAMA Oçak Z. RISE OF SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT WHILE GLOBALISATION AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CONCEPTS ARE DEVALUATED. IJSHS. 2019;3:113–126.
MLA Oçak, Zeliha. “RISE OF SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT WHILE GLOBALISATION AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CONCEPTS ARE DEVALUATED”. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences, c. 3, sy. 1, 2019, ss. 113-26.
Vancouver Oçak Z. RISE OF SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT WHILE GLOBALISATION AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CONCEPTS ARE DEVALUATED. IJSHS. 2019;3(1):113-26.