Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=9H26jiAdg_FB3KJ5JG1imUcxX5Betljqg6cNEKPkXQ4&_path=id%3D62307%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Den%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
 
BibTex RIS Cite

A Note on –mAdAn (önce)

Year 2015, Volume: 26 Issue: 1, 25 - 42, 07.07.2015

Martina Gracanin-yüksek

https://doi.org/10.18492/da.85897

Abstract

References

  • Aygen, G. (2002). Finiteness, case and clausal architecture. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.
  • Beaver, D., & Condoravdi C. (2003). A Uniform Analysis of Before and After. Semantics and Linguistic Theory, XIII, 37-54.
  • Condoravdi, C. (2010). NPI licensing in temporal clauses. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, 877-910.
  • Del Prete, F. (2006). The Semantics of the Italian Temporal Conjunctions Prima ‘before’ and Dopo ‘after’. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
  • Göksel, A., & Kerslake C. (2005). Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Horn, L. (2010). The expression of negation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Kabak, B., & Vogel I. (2001). The phonological word & stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology, 18, 315-360.
  • Kahnemuyipour, A. & Kornfilt J. (2006). Declassifying Turkish ‘Pre-stressing’ Suffixes. In C. Gurski & M. Radisic (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Retrieved September 25, 2014, from http://westernlinguistics.ca/Publications/CLA2006/Kahnemuyipour_Kornfil.pdf
  • Kelepir, M. (2001). Topics in Turkish syntax: clausal structure and scope. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Krifka, M. (2010). Before and After without coercion: comment on the paper by Cleo Condoravdi. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, 911-929.
  • Ladusaw, W. (1979). Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
  • Landman, F. (1991). Structures for Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Lewis, G. (1967). Turkish grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nam, S. (1997, July). The Semantics of Before and Negative Polarity. Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • Portner, P. (1994). A Uniform Semantics for Aspectual –ing. In M. Gonzalez (Ed.), Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society 24 (pp.507-517). Amherst: GLSA.
  • Sezer, Ε. (1981). On non-final stress in Turkish. Journal of Turkish Studies, 5, 61-69.
  • Thompson, S. A., Longacre, R. E., & Hwang, Sh. J. (2007). Adverbial Clauses. In S. Timothy (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume II: Complex Constructions (pp237-300). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tsoulas, G. (2013, June). Before-Clauses: Comparison, Presupposition, and the Syntax- Semantics Interface. Paper presented at the SFB Guest lecture series, University of Stuttgart.
  • Valencia, V. S., Van der Wouden, T., & Zwarts, F. (1994). Polarity, veridicality, and temporal connectives. In P. Dekker & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Amsterdam Colloquium, December 14-17, 1993 (pp587-606).

A Note on –mAdAn (önce)

Year 2015, Volume: 26 Issue: 1, 25 - 42, 07.07.2015

Martina Gracanin-yüksek

https://doi.org/10.18492/da.85897

Abstract

The paper discusses the morphological make-up of the converbial ending –mAdAn in adverbial clauses denoting temporal antecedence (before-clauses) and negative manner (without-clauses). In clauses denoting temporal antecedence, the converbial ending is optionally followed by the postposition önce ‘before’. The argument presented in the paper is that the converbial ending –mAdAn contains a negative marker –mA only in clauses where it is not followed by önce, while when the postposition follows, it contains the homophonous nominalizing suffix instead. Evidence for the claim comes on the one hand, from the fact that –mAdAn önce clauses do not license negative polarity items (but –mAdAn clauses do), and on the other, from the fact that –mAdAn önce clauses allow an addition of a negation marker to the converb (but –mAdAn clauses do not).

Keywords: –mAdAn (önce), temporal adverbial clauses, converb, negation, NPI’s

Keywords

–mAdAn (önce) temporal adverbial clauses converb negation NPI’s

References

  • Aygen, G. (2002). Finiteness, case and clausal architecture. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.
  • Beaver, D., & Condoravdi C. (2003). A Uniform Analysis of Before and After. Semantics and Linguistic Theory, XIII, 37-54.
  • Condoravdi, C. (2010). NPI licensing in temporal clauses. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, 877-910.
  • Del Prete, F. (2006). The Semantics of the Italian Temporal Conjunctions Prima ‘before’ and Dopo ‘after’. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
  • Göksel, A., & Kerslake C. (2005). Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Horn, L. (2010). The expression of negation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Kabak, B., & Vogel I. (2001). The phonological word & stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology, 18, 315-360.
  • Kahnemuyipour, A. & Kornfilt J. (2006). Declassifying Turkish ‘Pre-stressing’ Suffixes. In C. Gurski & M. Radisic (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Retrieved September 25, 2014, from http://westernlinguistics.ca/Publications/CLA2006/Kahnemuyipour_Kornfil.pdf
  • Kelepir, M. (2001). Topics in Turkish syntax: clausal structure and scope. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Krifka, M. (2010). Before and After without coercion: comment on the paper by Cleo Condoravdi. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, 911-929.
  • Ladusaw, W. (1979). Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
  • Landman, F. (1991). Structures for Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Lewis, G. (1967). Turkish grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nam, S. (1997, July). The Semantics of Before and Negative Polarity. Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • Portner, P. (1994). A Uniform Semantics for Aspectual –ing. In M. Gonzalez (Ed.), Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society 24 (pp.507-517). Amherst: GLSA.
  • Sezer, Ε. (1981). On non-final stress in Turkish. Journal of Turkish Studies, 5, 61-69.
  • Thompson, S. A., Longacre, R. E., & Hwang, Sh. J. (2007). Adverbial Clauses. In S. Timothy (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume II: Complex Constructions (pp237-300). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tsoulas, G. (2013, June). Before-Clauses: Comparison, Presupposition, and the Syntax- Semantics Interface. Paper presented at the SFB Guest lecture series, University of Stuttgart.
  • Valencia, V. S., Van der Wouden, T., & Zwarts, F. (1994). Polarity, veridicality, and temporal connectives. In P. Dekker & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Amsterdam Colloquium, December 14-17, 1993 (pp587-606).
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Martina Gracanin-yüksek

Publication Date July 7, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 26 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Gracanin-yüksek, M. (2015). A Note on –mAdAn (önce). Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 26(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.18492/da.85897

88x31.png

This work is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) International License.


Journal DOI: 10.18492/dad