Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=aUAccc9X8NtXcD-K8mxNjc_jnsJsq65BvjKhsCyF4ic&_path=id%3D696304%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Den%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Son Edinilen İlk Unutulur Prensibi: Tipik Gelişim Gösteren Çocuklar ve Broka Afazili Bireylerin Türkçe İlgi Tümcelerini Anlamlandırma Süreçleri

Year 2020, Volume: 31 Issue: 1, 33 - 53, 28.06.2020

Duygu Özge , Müzeyyen Çiyiltepe , Hasan Gürkan Tekman

https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.696304

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Broka afazisi olan bireyler ile tipik gelişim gösteren çocukların karmaşık tümce yapıları içeren ifadeleri anlama yetilerinde benzerlik olup olmadığını araştırmaktyadır. Çalışmada, ifade-cümle eşleştirme testi kullanılarak Broka afazili bireylerin ve 3;04-4;03 yaşlarındaki çocukların Türkçe ilgi tümcelerini anlama yetileri test edilmiştir. Çocuklar da afazili bireyler de nesne ilgi tümcelerinde özne ilgi tümcelerine göre daha iyi bir anlama performansı sergilemişlerdir. Bu bulgular, Sol Posteriyor Inferiyor Prefrontal Girus’un sözdizimsel olarak daha karmaşık yapı sergileyen ifadeleri işlemede etkisi olduğunu varsayan kuramlarla uyum göstermektedir. Çocukların Broka afazili bireylerle benzer bir performans sergilemeleri bahsi geçen beyin bölgesinin geç gelişmesine bağlanabilmektedir. Çalışmaya katılan katılımcılar, nesne ilgi tümcelerinde tümcenin öznesi tümce başında yer almasına rağmen bu yapıları anlamakta güçlük çekmişlerdir. Bu bulgu alanyazında önerilmiş ‘ilk öge özne olur’ stratejisi ile uyumsuzluk göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, özne ilgi tümcelerindeki anlama güçlüğünü bu yapılardaki biçimbirimsel birimlerin karmaşıklığına bağlanmıştır.

Keywords

Türkçe ilgi tümceleri Broka afazisi dil edinimi dil anlama

References

  • Aydın, Ö. (2007). The comprehension of Turkish relative clauses in second language acquisition and agrammatism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 295-315.
  • Braak H & Braak E. (1996). Evolution of the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 94 (S165), 3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1996.tb05866.x.
  • Brass, M. & von Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Selection for Cognitive Control: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Selection of Task-Relevant Information. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(40), 8847-8852, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2513-04.2004.
  • Brauer, J. Anwander, A., Perani, D., & Friederici A.D. (2013). Dorsal and ventral pathways in language development. Brain and Language, 127(2), 289-295. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.03.001.
  • Brauer, J., Anwander, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Neuroanatomical prerequisites for language functions in the maturing brain. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 459-466, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq108.
  • Choi, Y. & Trueswell, J. (2010). Children’s (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 41-61.
doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.01.003.
  • Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). German children’s comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Development, 79(4), 1152-1167. 
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01181.x.
  • Friederici, A. D. (2011). Brain basis of language processing: From processing to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357-1392. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2011.
  • Friederici, A. D. (2012). Language development and the ontogeny of the dorsal pathway. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience 4(3), doi: 10.3389/fnevo.2012.00003.
  • Friederici, A. D. (2009). Pathways to language: Fiber tracts in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 175-181, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.001.
  • Friederici, A. D, Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel I. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1709-1717, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj106.
  • Friederici, A. D., Oberecker, R., & Brauer, J. (2012). Neurophysiological preconditions of syntax acquisition. Psychological Research, 76 (2), 204-211, doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0357-0.
  • Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1-7, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00002399.
  • Grodzinsky, Y. Wexler, K., Chien, Y. C., Marakovits, S. & Solomon, J. The breakdown of binding relations. Brain and Language 45(3), 396–422, doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1052.
  • Grodzinsky, Y. & Reinhart, T. (1993) The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24(1), 69-102, Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178802.
  • Huttenlocher, P. R., & Dabholkar, A. S. (1997). Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 387(2), 167–178, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19971020)387:2<167::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-Z.
  • Jakobson, R. (1941/1968). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.
  • January, D., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Co-localization of Stroop and syntactic ambiguity resolution in Broca’s Area: Implications for the neural basis of sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(12), 2434-2444. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21179.
  • Knoll, L. J. Obleser, J., Schipke, C. S., Friederici A. D., & Brauer, J., (2012). Left prefrontal cortex activation during sentence comprehension covaries with grammatical knowledge in children. Neuroimage, 62(1), 207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.014.
  • Kolk, H. H. J. (2001). Disorders of syntax in aphasia: Linguistic-descriptive and processing approaches. In: Handbook of Neurolinguistics, ed. B. Stemmer & H. A. Whitaker. Academic Press.
  • MacDonald, A.W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Cognitive Control, Science, 288 (5472), 1835-1838, doi: 10.1126/science.288.5472.1835.
  • MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163.
  • Mason, R. A., Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (2003). Ambiguity in the Brain: What Brain Imaging Reveals About the Processing of Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1319-1338, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1319.
  • Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005). Cognitive Control and Parsing: Reexamining the Role of Broca's Area in Sentence Comprehension. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(3), 263-281, doi: 10.3758/CABN.5.3.263.
  • Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2010). Broca’s area and language processing: Evidence for the cognitive control connection. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(10), 906-924, doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00244.x. Özge, D., Marinis, T., & Zeyrek, D. (2015). Incremental processing in head-final child language: on-line comprehension of relative clauses in Turkish-speaking children and adults. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience (formerly titled Language and Cognitive Processes), 27. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.995108.
  • Perani, D., Saccuman, M. C., Scifo, P., Anwander, A., Spada, D., Baldoli, C., Poloniato, A., Lohmann, G., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Neural language networks at birth. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of U.S.A., 108 (38), 16056-16061, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102991108.
  • Pujol, J., Soriano-Mas, C., Ortiz, H., Sebastian-Galles, N., Losilla, J. M., & Deus, J. (2006). Myelination of language-related areas in the developing brain. Neurology, 66(3), 339-343, doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000201049.66073.8d.
  • Reisberg, B., Franssen, E., Hasan, S., Monteiro, I., Boksay, I., Sourcen, L., Kenowsky, S., Auer, S. R., Elahi, S., & Kluger, A. (1999). Retrogenesis: Clinical, physiologic, and pathologic mechanisms in brain aging, Alzheimer’s, and other dementing processes. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 249(S3), 28-36, doi: 10.1007/PL00014170.
  • Ribot, T. (bot, 2012, originally published 1881). Diseases of the memory: An essay in the positive psychology. New York, NY: D. Appleton and Company.
  • Schipke CS, Knoll LJ, Friederici AD, Oberecker R. 2012. Preschool children’s interpretation of object-initial sentences: Neural correlates of their behavioral performance. Developmental Science, 15(6), 762-774. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01167.x.
  • Skeide, M. A., Brauer, J. & Friederici, A. D. (2015). Brain functional and structural predictors of language performance. Cerebral Cortex, 1-13, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv042.
  • Swinney, D., Zurif, E. B. & Nicol, J. (1989) The effects of focal brain damage on sentence processing. An examination of the neurological organization of a mental module. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1(1), 25-37, doi: 10.1162/jocn.1989.1.1.25.
  • Thomson-Schill, S. L., Jonides, J., Marschuetz, C., Smith, E. E., D’esposito, M., Kan, I. P., Knight, R. T., & Scick, T. (2002). Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(2), 109-120, doi: 10.3758/CABN.2.2.109.
  • Trueswell, J., Sekerina, I. A., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89-134. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3.
  • Wexler, K. & Chien, Y.C. (1985). The Development of Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns, Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 24, 138-49, ERIC Number: ED261549.

Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia

Year 2020, Volume: 31 Issue: 1, 33 - 53, 28.06.2020

Duygu Özge , Müzeyyen Çiyiltepe , Hasan Gürkan Tekman

https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.696304

Abstract

The present study addresses whether adults with Broca’s aphasia who have damage in their Posterior Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus (PLIFG) show similar performance to typically developing children in their processing of complex syntax. We tested comprehension of Turkish relative clauses using a sentence-picture matching task in Broca’s patients and children with typical development (aged: 3;04-4;03). Both groups showed better performance in subject relative clauses compared to object relative clauses. Children's similar performance to Broca's patients might be due to the fact that PLIFG is a late-maturing neural region. Our participants had more errors in object relative clauses despite the first referent was the agent so there was no evidence for the agent-first strategy. Poor performance in object relative clauses was linked to the morphosyntactic complexity in these structures.

Keywords

Turkish relative clauses Broca’s aphasia child language comprehension

References

  • Aydın, Ö. (2007). The comprehension of Turkish relative clauses in second language acquisition and agrammatism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 295-315.
  • Braak H & Braak E. (1996). Evolution of the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 94 (S165), 3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1996.tb05866.x.
  • Brass, M. & von Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Selection for Cognitive Control: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Selection of Task-Relevant Information. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(40), 8847-8852, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2513-04.2004.
  • Brauer, J. Anwander, A., Perani, D., & Friederici A.D. (2013). Dorsal and ventral pathways in language development. Brain and Language, 127(2), 289-295. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.03.001.
  • Brauer, J., Anwander, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Neuroanatomical prerequisites for language functions in the maturing brain. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 459-466, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq108.
  • Choi, Y. & Trueswell, J. (2010). Children’s (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 41-61.
doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.01.003.
  • Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). German children’s comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Development, 79(4), 1152-1167. 
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01181.x.
  • Friederici, A. D. (2011). Brain basis of language processing: From processing to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357-1392. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2011.
  • Friederici, A. D. (2012). Language development and the ontogeny of the dorsal pathway. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience 4(3), doi: 10.3389/fnevo.2012.00003.
  • Friederici, A. D. (2009). Pathways to language: Fiber tracts in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 175-181, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.001.
  • Friederici, A. D, Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel I. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1709-1717, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj106.
  • Friederici, A. D., Oberecker, R., & Brauer, J. (2012). Neurophysiological preconditions of syntax acquisition. Psychological Research, 76 (2), 204-211, doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0357-0.
  • Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1-7, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00002399.
  • Grodzinsky, Y. Wexler, K., Chien, Y. C., Marakovits, S. & Solomon, J. The breakdown of binding relations. Brain and Language 45(3), 396–422, doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1052.
  • Grodzinsky, Y. & Reinhart, T. (1993) The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24(1), 69-102, Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178802.
  • Huttenlocher, P. R., & Dabholkar, A. S. (1997). Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 387(2), 167–178, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19971020)387:2<167::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-Z.
  • Jakobson, R. (1941/1968). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.
  • January, D., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Co-localization of Stroop and syntactic ambiguity resolution in Broca’s Area: Implications for the neural basis of sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(12), 2434-2444. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21179.
  • Knoll, L. J. Obleser, J., Schipke, C. S., Friederici A. D., & Brauer, J., (2012). Left prefrontal cortex activation during sentence comprehension covaries with grammatical knowledge in children. Neuroimage, 62(1), 207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.014.
  • Kolk, H. H. J. (2001). Disorders of syntax in aphasia: Linguistic-descriptive and processing approaches. In: Handbook of Neurolinguistics, ed. B. Stemmer & H. A. Whitaker. Academic Press.
  • MacDonald, A.W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Cognitive Control, Science, 288 (5472), 1835-1838, doi: 10.1126/science.288.5472.1835.
  • MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163.
  • Mason, R. A., Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (2003). Ambiguity in the Brain: What Brain Imaging Reveals About the Processing of Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1319-1338, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1319.
  • Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005). Cognitive Control and Parsing: Reexamining the Role of Broca's Area in Sentence Comprehension. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(3), 263-281, doi: 10.3758/CABN.5.3.263.
  • Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2010). Broca’s area and language processing: Evidence for the cognitive control connection. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(10), 906-924, doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00244.x. Özge, D., Marinis, T., & Zeyrek, D. (2015). Incremental processing in head-final child language: on-line comprehension of relative clauses in Turkish-speaking children and adults. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience (formerly titled Language and Cognitive Processes), 27. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.995108.
  • Perani, D., Saccuman, M. C., Scifo, P., Anwander, A., Spada, D., Baldoli, C., Poloniato, A., Lohmann, G., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Neural language networks at birth. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of U.S.A., 108 (38), 16056-16061, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102991108.
  • Pujol, J., Soriano-Mas, C., Ortiz, H., Sebastian-Galles, N., Losilla, J. M., & Deus, J. (2006). Myelination of language-related areas in the developing brain. Neurology, 66(3), 339-343, doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000201049.66073.8d.
  • Reisberg, B., Franssen, E., Hasan, S., Monteiro, I., Boksay, I., Sourcen, L., Kenowsky, S., Auer, S. R., Elahi, S., & Kluger, A. (1999). Retrogenesis: Clinical, physiologic, and pathologic mechanisms in brain aging, Alzheimer’s, and other dementing processes. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 249(S3), 28-36, doi: 10.1007/PL00014170.
  • Ribot, T. (bot, 2012, originally published 1881). Diseases of the memory: An essay in the positive psychology. New York, NY: D. Appleton and Company.
  • Schipke CS, Knoll LJ, Friederici AD, Oberecker R. 2012. Preschool children’s interpretation of object-initial sentences: Neural correlates of their behavioral performance. Developmental Science, 15(6), 762-774. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01167.x.
  • Skeide, M. A., Brauer, J. & Friederici, A. D. (2015). Brain functional and structural predictors of language performance. Cerebral Cortex, 1-13, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv042.
  • Swinney, D., Zurif, E. B. & Nicol, J. (1989) The effects of focal brain damage on sentence processing. An examination of the neurological organization of a mental module. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1(1), 25-37, doi: 10.1162/jocn.1989.1.1.25.
  • Thomson-Schill, S. L., Jonides, J., Marschuetz, C., Smith, E. E., D’esposito, M., Kan, I. P., Knight, R. T., & Scick, T. (2002). Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(2), 109-120, doi: 10.3758/CABN.2.2.109.
  • Trueswell, J., Sekerina, I. A., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89-134. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3.
  • Wexler, K. & Chien, Y.C. (1985). The Development of Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns, Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 24, 138-49, ERIC Number: ED261549.
There are 35 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Duygu Özge

Müzeyyen Çiyiltepe

Hasan Gürkan Tekman

Publication Date June 28, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 31 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özge, D., Çiyiltepe, M., & Tekman, H. G. (2020). Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 31(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.696304

88x31.png

This work is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) International License.


Journal DOI: 10.18492/dad