Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

TİD’de Buyurma Yapılarının Özellikleri

Year 2018, , 161 - 178, 02.07.2018

A. Sumru Ozsoy , Meltem Kelepir , Derya Nuhbalaoğlu Emre Hakgüder

https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.373380
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Türk İşaret Dili’ndeki (TİD) emir yapıları
incelenmektedir.  Çalışmada TİD emir
yapılarının ezgisel, biçimbirimsel, biçim-sesbilimsel ve sözdizimsel
özelliklerini belirlemek amacıyla bu yapıların el ve el-dışı işaretlerinin
niteliği ve işlevleri incelenmektedir. Bazı işitsel ve işaret dillerindeki emir
yapılarında zorunlu oldukları belirlenmiş olan özelliklerden hiçbirini TİD’in
yansıtmadığı gözlemlenmiştir. TİD emir yapılarının en belirgin özelliğinin
el-dışı işaret olan öne/yana baş eğmesi olduğu saptanmıştır.

Keywords

command manuals nonmanuals

References

  • Açan, Z. (2007) A linguistic analysis on basic sentence types in Turkish Sign Language (TİD) with reference to non-manual activity. PhD dissertation, Hacettepe University.
  • Aikhenvald, A.Y. (2012) Imperatives and commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Alba, C., D. Aliaga, G. Barberà, S. Frigola and J. Quer (2013) In search of imperatives in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Paper presented at Workshop on SL Imperatives, WG2 SignGram. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, 30 May 2013.
  • Bonifacio E., M. Capiotto, M. Chistè and G. Quartana (2011) Analisi delle tipologie di imperative nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana. Ms. Università Ca. Foscari Venezia.
  • Brynjólfsdóttir, E.G. and J. Jónsson (2013) Imperatives in ÍTM. Paper presented at Work- shop on SL Imperatives, WG2 SignGram. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, 30 May 2013.
  • Cecchetto, C. (2012) Sentence types. In: Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach and Bencie Woll (eds.) Sign language: An international handbook. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Dikyuva, H. (2011) Aspectual non-manual expressions in TİD. MA Thesis, University of Central Lanchashire (UCLan).
  • Dikyuva, H. and U. Zeshan (2008) Türk İşaret Dili: Birinci seviye [Turkish Sign Language: Level one]. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
  • Donati, C. and C. Branchini (2012) Handout at Workshop on imperatives at COST Work Group 2 meeting. Nijmegen University, 21–23 November 2012.
  • Donati, C., G. Barbera, C. Branchini, C. Cecchetto, C. Geraci and J. Quer (2017) Searching for impreatives in European sign languages. In: D. van Olmen and S. Heimold (eds.) Imperatives and other directive strategies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Gökgöz, K. and E. Arık (2011) Distributional and syntactic characteristics of non-manual markers in Turkish Sign Language (Turk İsaret Dili, TİD). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 62, Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, 63–78. Han, C. (2000) The sructure and interpretation of imperatives: Mood and force in Universal Grammar. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Garland Publishing.
  • Iatridou, S. (2008) De modo imperativo. Lecture notes, ENS, Paris, September 16–19, 2008. Iatridou, S. (2012) Seminar on imperatives. COST Work Group 2 meeting. Nijmegen University, 21–23 November 2012.
  • Kubuş, O. (2008) An analysis of Turkish sign language (TİD) phonology and morphology. MSc. Thesis, Middle East Technical University.
  • Maier, E., K. de Schepper and M. Zwets (2013) The pragmatics of person and imperatives in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Research in Language 11(4): 359–376.
  • Mauck, S. (2005) Notes on the typology of imperatives. http://www.georgetown.edu/fac- ulty/portnerp/nsfsite/nsfframeset.htm, Georgetown University.
  • Meir, I. (1998) Syntactic-semantic interaction in Israeli Sign Language verbs: The case of backwards verbs. Sign Language and Linguistics 1: 3–33.
  • Özsoy, S., E. Arık, A. Göksel, M. Kelepir and D. Nuhbalaoğlu (2013) Documenting Turkish Sign Language. In: E. Arık (ed.) Current directions in Turkish Sign Language research, 55–70. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Portner, P. (2004) The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14: 235–252.
  • Portner, P. (2007) Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics 15(4): 351–383.
  • Rutkowski, P. (2013) Imperatives in Polish Sign Language (PJM). Paper presented at Workshop on SL Imperatives, WG2 SignGram. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul.
  • Schröder, B.S., O.-I. Schröder and R.P. Halvorsen (2013) On imperative in Norwegian Sign Language (NSL). Paper presented at Workshop on SL Imperatives, WG2 Sign- Gram. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, 30 May 2013.
  • Sevinç, A.M. (2006) Grammatical relations and word order in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). M.S.Thesis, Middle East Technical University.
  • Valli, C. and C. Lucas (1992) Linguistics of American Sign Language. Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
  • von Fintel, K. and S. Iatridou (2010) What is in Mediterranean imperative. A presentation based on a keynote address to the 2nd Mediterranean Meeting in Athens, Greece, Octo- ber 8–10, 2010.
  • von Fintel, K. and S. Iatridou (2012) Imperative puzzles. Slides for the paper presented at the Linguistic Colloquium, Amherst, 9 March 2012.
  • Wilbur, R. (2010) The semantics-phonology interface. In: D. Brentari (ed.) Sign languages, 355–380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zanuttini, R. (2008) Encoding the addressee in the syntax: Evidence from English impera- tive subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26(1): 185–218.
  • Zeshan, U. (2002) Sign Language in Turkey: The story of a hidden language. Turkic Lan- gauges 6(2): 229–274.
  • Zeshan, U. (2003) Aspects of Türk İşaret Dili (Turkish Sign Language). Sign Language and Linguistics 6(1): 43–75.
  • Zhang, S. (1990) The status of imperatives in theories of grammar. PhD dissertation, Uni- versity of Arizona.

Properties of Command Constructions in TİD

Year 2018, , 161 - 178, 02.07.2018

A. Sumru Ozsoy , Meltem Kelepir , Derya Nuhbalaoğlu Emre Hakgüder

https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.373380
Cited By: 1

Abstract

This paper focuses on the properties of command
constructions in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). The nature and function of manual
signs and nonmanual markers in command constructions in TİD are investigated to
determine their prosodic, morphological, morphophonological, and syntactic
properties. We show that TİD does not utilize any of the properties reported in
the literature as an obligatory marker of commands in some spoken and sign
languages. The only salient marker of commands we have identified is a
nonmanual marker: (forward/sideward) head tilt.

References

  • Açan, Z. (2007) A linguistic analysis on basic sentence types in Turkish Sign Language (TİD) with reference to non-manual activity. PhD dissertation, Hacettepe University.
  • Aikhenvald, A.Y. (2012) Imperatives and commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Alba, C., D. Aliaga, G. Barberà, S. Frigola and J. Quer (2013) In search of imperatives in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Paper presented at Workshop on SL Imperatives, WG2 SignGram. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, 30 May 2013.
  • Bonifacio E., M. Capiotto, M. Chistè and G. Quartana (2011) Analisi delle tipologie di imperative nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana. Ms. Università Ca. Foscari Venezia.
  • Brynjólfsdóttir, E.G. and J. Jónsson (2013) Imperatives in ÍTM. Paper presented at Work- shop on SL Imperatives, WG2 SignGram. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, 30 May 2013.
  • Cecchetto, C. (2012) Sentence types. In: Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach and Bencie Woll (eds.) Sign language: An international handbook. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Dikyuva, H. (2011) Aspectual non-manual expressions in TİD. MA Thesis, University of Central Lanchashire (UCLan).
  • Dikyuva, H. and U. Zeshan (2008) Türk İşaret Dili: Birinci seviye [Turkish Sign Language: Level one]. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
  • Donati, C. and C. Branchini (2012) Handout at Workshop on imperatives at COST Work Group 2 meeting. Nijmegen University, 21–23 November 2012.
  • Donati, C., G. Barbera, C. Branchini, C. Cecchetto, C. Geraci and J. Quer (2017) Searching for impreatives in European sign languages. In: D. van Olmen and S. Heimold (eds.) Imperatives and other directive strategies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Gökgöz, K. and E. Arık (2011) Distributional and syntactic characteristics of non-manual markers in Turkish Sign Language (Turk İsaret Dili, TİD). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 62, Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, 63–78. Han, C. (2000) The sructure and interpretation of imperatives: Mood and force in Universal Grammar. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Garland Publishing.
  • Iatridou, S. (2008) De modo imperativo. Lecture notes, ENS, Paris, September 16–19, 2008. Iatridou, S. (2012) Seminar on imperatives. COST Work Group 2 meeting. Nijmegen University, 21–23 November 2012.
  • Kubuş, O. (2008) An analysis of Turkish sign language (TİD) phonology and morphology. MSc. Thesis, Middle East Technical University.
  • Maier, E., K. de Schepper and M. Zwets (2013) The pragmatics of person and imperatives in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Research in Language 11(4): 359–376.
  • Mauck, S. (2005) Notes on the typology of imperatives. http://www.georgetown.edu/fac- ulty/portnerp/nsfsite/nsfframeset.htm, Georgetown University.
  • Meir, I. (1998) Syntactic-semantic interaction in Israeli Sign Language verbs: The case of backwards verbs. Sign Language and Linguistics 1: 3–33.
  • Özsoy, S., E. Arık, A. Göksel, M. Kelepir and D. Nuhbalaoğlu (2013) Documenting Turkish Sign Language. In: E. Arık (ed.) Current directions in Turkish Sign Language research, 55–70. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Portner, P. (2004) The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14: 235–252.
  • Portner, P. (2007) Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics 15(4): 351–383.
  • Rutkowski, P. (2013) Imperatives in Polish Sign Language (PJM). Paper presented at Workshop on SL Imperatives, WG2 SignGram. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul.
  • Schröder, B.S., O.-I. Schröder and R.P. Halvorsen (2013) On imperative in Norwegian Sign Language (NSL). Paper presented at Workshop on SL Imperatives, WG2 Sign- Gram. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, 30 May 2013.
  • Sevinç, A.M. (2006) Grammatical relations and word order in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). M.S.Thesis, Middle East Technical University.
  • Valli, C. and C. Lucas (1992) Linguistics of American Sign Language. Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
  • von Fintel, K. and S. Iatridou (2010) What is in Mediterranean imperative. A presentation based on a keynote address to the 2nd Mediterranean Meeting in Athens, Greece, Octo- ber 8–10, 2010.
  • von Fintel, K. and S. Iatridou (2012) Imperative puzzles. Slides for the paper presented at the Linguistic Colloquium, Amherst, 9 March 2012.
  • Wilbur, R. (2010) The semantics-phonology interface. In: D. Brentari (ed.) Sign languages, 355–380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zanuttini, R. (2008) Encoding the addressee in the syntax: Evidence from English impera- tive subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26(1): 185–218.
  • Zeshan, U. (2002) Sign Language in Turkey: The story of a hidden language. Turkic Lan- gauges 6(2): 229–274.
  • Zeshan, U. (2003) Aspects of Türk İşaret Dili (Turkish Sign Language). Sign Language and Linguistics 6(1): 43–75.
  • Zhang, S. (1990) The status of imperatives in theories of grammar. PhD dissertation, Uni- versity of Arizona.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

A. Sumru Ozsoy

Meltem Kelepir

Derya Nuhbalaoğlu

Emre Hakgüder

Publication Date July 2, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018

Cite

APA Ozsoy, A. S., Kelepir, M., Nuhbalaoğlu, D., Hakgüder, E. (2018). Properties of Command Constructions in TİD. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 29(1), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.373380

Cited By

Simultaneity of certainty in Turkish Sign Language (TİD)
Journal of Pragmatics
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.08.010

88x31.png

Bu eser


Dergi DOI:10.18492/dad