Book Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Book Review - Contemporary Morphological Theories: A User's Guide. Thomas W. Stewart, 2015. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 192 pages. ISBN 978 07 486 9268 2

Year 2018, Volume: 29 Issue: 2, 129 - 137, 28.12.2018

Ugurcan Vurgun

https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.454621

Abstract

Review of Contemporary Morphological Theories: A User's Guide. Thomas W. Stewart, 2015.  Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 192 pages. ISBN 978 07 486 9268 2

Keywords

Morphology Syntax

References

  • Anderson, S. R. (1982). Where's Morphology?. Linguistic Inquiry, 13(4): 571-612.
  • Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-Morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beard, R. (1982). Is separation natural?. Studia Gramatycne VII, 119:33.
  • Beard R. (1995). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Blevins, J. P. (2006). Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42(3), 531:73.
  • Blevins, J. P. (2005). Word-based declension in Estonian. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 2005. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.1-25.
  • Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam/Philedelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Dressler, W. U. (1985). Morphonology, the dynamics of derivation (Vol. 12). Ann Arbor: Karoma.
  • Embick, D. & Noyer R. (2007). Distributed Morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp.289-324.
  • Evans, R., & Gazdar, G. (1996). DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational linguistics, 22(2), 167-216.
  • Halle, M. & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.) The View from Building 20: Linguistics Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. MA: MIT Press, pp.111-76.
  • Harley H. & Noyer R. ([1999] 2003). Distributed Morphology. In Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma (eds.) The Second GLOT International State-of-the-article Book: The Latest in Linguistics [Studies in Generative Grammar [SGG] 61], Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.463-96.
  • Hoeksema, J. (1985). Categorial Morphology. (Doctoral Dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen) New York: Garland Publishing, 1985. 237 р.
  • Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981, pp.3-91.
  • Lieber, R. (1980). On the organization of the lexicon (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
  • McCarthy, J. J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic inquiry, 12(3), 373-418.
  • Matushansky, O., & Marantz, A. P. (Eds.). (2013). Distributed Morphology Today. MIT Press.
  • Montague, R. (1970). Universal grammar. Theoria, 36(3), 373-398.
  • Sadock, J. M. (1985). Autolexical syntax: A proposal for the treatment of noun incorporation and similar phenomena. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 3(4), 379-439.
  • Spencer, A. (2013). Lexical Relatedness: A Paradigm-based Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Spencer, A., & Zwicky, A. M. (Eds.). (1998). The handbook of morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Stewart, T. (2008). A Consumer's Guide to Contemporary Morphological Theories. OSUWPL 58: 138-230.
  • Stewart, T. (2015). Contemporary Morphological Theories: A User's Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Stewart, T., & Stump, G. (2007). Paradigm function morphology and the morphology-syntax interface. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp.383-421.
  • Stump, G. T. (1991). A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language, 675-725.
  • Stump, G. T. (1990). Breton inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In The Syntax of the Modern Celtic Languages [Syntax and Semantics 23]. San Diego: Academic Press, pp.97-119.
  • Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional Morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wunderlich, D., & Fabri, R. (1995). Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 14(2), 236-294.

Kitap Tanıtımı - Contemporary Morphological Theories: A User's Guide. Thomas W. Stewart, 2015. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 192 pages. ISBN 978 07 486 9268 2

Year 2018, Volume: 29 Issue: 2, 129 - 137, 28.12.2018

Ugurcan Vurgun

https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.454621

Abstract

Contemporary Morphological Theories: A User's Guide. Thomas W. Stewart, 2015.  Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 192 sayfa. ISBN 978 07 486 9268 2 isimli kitabın incelemesi sunulmuştur.

Keywords

Biçimbilim Sözdizim

References

  • Anderson, S. R. (1982). Where's Morphology?. Linguistic Inquiry, 13(4): 571-612.
  • Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-Morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beard, R. (1982). Is separation natural?. Studia Gramatycne VII, 119:33.
  • Beard R. (1995). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Blevins, J. P. (2006). Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42(3), 531:73.
  • Blevins, J. P. (2005). Word-based declension in Estonian. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 2005. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.1-25.
  • Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam/Philedelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Dressler, W. U. (1985). Morphonology, the dynamics of derivation (Vol. 12). Ann Arbor: Karoma.
  • Embick, D. & Noyer R. (2007). Distributed Morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp.289-324.
  • Evans, R., & Gazdar, G. (1996). DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational linguistics, 22(2), 167-216.
  • Halle, M. & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.) The View from Building 20: Linguistics Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. MA: MIT Press, pp.111-76.
  • Harley H. & Noyer R. ([1999] 2003). Distributed Morphology. In Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma (eds.) The Second GLOT International State-of-the-article Book: The Latest in Linguistics [Studies in Generative Grammar [SGG] 61], Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.463-96.
  • Hoeksema, J. (1985). Categorial Morphology. (Doctoral Dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen) New York: Garland Publishing, 1985. 237 р.
  • Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981, pp.3-91.
  • Lieber, R. (1980). On the organization of the lexicon (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
  • McCarthy, J. J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic inquiry, 12(3), 373-418.
  • Matushansky, O., & Marantz, A. P. (Eds.). (2013). Distributed Morphology Today. MIT Press.
  • Montague, R. (1970). Universal grammar. Theoria, 36(3), 373-398.
  • Sadock, J. M. (1985). Autolexical syntax: A proposal for the treatment of noun incorporation and similar phenomena. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 3(4), 379-439.
  • Spencer, A. (2013). Lexical Relatedness: A Paradigm-based Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Spencer, A., & Zwicky, A. M. (Eds.). (1998). The handbook of morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Stewart, T. (2008). A Consumer's Guide to Contemporary Morphological Theories. OSUWPL 58: 138-230.
  • Stewart, T. (2015). Contemporary Morphological Theories: A User's Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Stewart, T., & Stump, G. (2007). Paradigm function morphology and the morphology-syntax interface. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp.383-421.
  • Stump, G. T. (1991). A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language, 675-725.
  • Stump, G. T. (1990). Breton inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In The Syntax of the Modern Celtic Languages [Syntax and Semantics 23]. San Diego: Academic Press, pp.97-119.
  • Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional Morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wunderlich, D., & Fabri, R. (1995). Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 14(2), 236-294.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Book Reviews
Authors

Ugurcan Vurgun 0000-0001-6021-4316

Publication Date December 28, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 29 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Vurgun, U. (2018). Book Review - Contemporary Morphological Theories: A User’s Guide. Thomas W. Stewart, 2015. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 192 pages. ISBN 978 07 486 9268 2. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 29(2), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.454621

88x31.png

This work is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) International License.


Journal DOI: 10.18492/dad