Wh-Island Constraint in Turkish
Abstract
The paper proposes that wh-island constraint does not hold in Turkish, at least for the constructions that contain more than one wh-phrase. The grammatically problematic constructions that have been uttered as wh-island violations in previous studies have been claimed to be weak Complex DP Island violations. The DP that c-commands the lower CP constitutes a weak DP island for the upper movement of the elements. Data obtained by Çakır (2016a) support this assertion since the findings of that study show that interpretation of wh-adjuncts within lower CPs are problematic even when there are not any intervening island structures. Another novel assertion proposed in the study is on the scope problem of the wh-constructions that contain multiple wh-adjuncts in their lower CPs. When there is more than one wh-adjunct within the embedded CP, either of them cannot take wide scope individually. The reason for this situation has been explained to be the absorption process. Once the operators of the wh-adjuncts are absorbed in lower spec CP position, they are forced to act together in the rest of the derivation. This process fits to the minimalist understanding of economy: if one operator can do the job, using two operators becomes costly.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Akar, D. 1990. Wh-questions in Turkish. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey.
- Aoun, J. & Li, Y.A. 1993. “Wh-elements in-situ: syntax or LF?” Linguistic Inquiry, 24 (2). 199-238.
- Arslan, C. 1999. Approaches to wh-structures in Turkish. Unpublished MA thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey.
- Chomsky, N. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (eds.). A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston. 232-286.
- Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.). Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1-52.
- Çakır, S. 2016a. “Island constraints and adjunct & argument asymmetry in Turkish”. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12 (29). 1-15.
- Çakır, S. 2016b. “The variability in the interpretation of different types of wh-adjuncts within island structures in Turkish”. Journal of International Scientific Reserach, 9 (46). 48-57.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Sinan Çakır
ADIYAMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
29 Aralık 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
24 Şubat 2017
Kabul Tarihi
2 Ekim 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2
