Appositive ki Clauses in Turkish

Hasan Mesut Meral

doi:10.18492/dad.309847

TR EN

Appositive ki Clauses in Turkish

Abstract

This study explores the post-nominal appositives formed with the so called complementizer ki in Turkish. It makes two sets of arguments: (i) Post-nominal appositives formed with ki do not form a constituent with their antecedents in syntax, instead they are formed as separate clauses, having their own illocutionary act and being opaque to syntactic operations of their host clauses, hence non-integrated in the sense of Cinque (2008), (ii) Appositive ki clauses involve neither subordination, nor coordination, rather they are ForcePs adjoining to the root clause, and this root level adjunction is characterized as concatenation without labels in the sense of Horstein (2009) and Citko (2016).

Keywords

appositive,ki clauses,relative clause,turkish

Kaynakça

Akerson, F. & Özil, Ş. (1998). Türkçede Niteleme: Sıfat İşlevli Yan Tümceler. İstanbul: Simurg Yayınları.
Aygen, G. (2003). Are there “Non-restrictive” Pre-relatives in Turkish? Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 199-215.
Bianchi, V. (1999). Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cinque, G. (2008). Two Types of Nonrestrictive Relatives. In O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 7, 99-137. Paris: University of Paris 7.
Citko, B. (2008). An Argument against Assimilating Appositive Relatives to Coordinate Structures. Linguistic Inquiry 39, 633-655.
Citko, B. (2016). Types of Appositive Relative Clauses in Polish. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 11(3), 85–110.
Çağrı, I. (2005). Minimality and Turkish Relative Clauses. PhD. dissertation, University of Maryland.
Del Gobbo, F. (2003). Appositives at the Interface. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California Irvine.

Del Gobbo, F. (2010). On Chinese Appositive Relative Clauses. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19(4), 385-417.
Demirdache, H. (1991). Resumptive Chains in Restrictive Relatives, Appositives, and Dislocation Structures. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Emonds, J. (1979). Appositive Relatives have no Properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 211-243.
Erguvanlı, E. (1981). A Case of Syntactic Change: Ki Constructions in Turkish. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi 8, 111-140.
Fabb, N. (1990). The Difference between English Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Relative Clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26, 57–78.
Göksel, A., & Kerslake, C. (2005). Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
Göksel, A., Kelepir, M., & Üntak-Tarhan, A. (2008). The Morphosyntactic Implications of Intonation as a Clause-typer. In Boeckx, C. & Ulutaş, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Altaic in Formal Linguistics, 39-50. MITWPL.
Griffiths J. (2015). On Appositives. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
Griffiths, J. & Güneş, G. (2014). Ki Issues in Turkish. In M. Kluck, D. Ott & M. de Vries (eds.), Parenthetical Coordination and Adjunction. Parenthesis and Ellipsis. Cross-linguistic and Theoretical Perspectives, 173-217. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Güneş, G. & Çöltekin, Ç. (2016). Prosody of Parentheticals in Turkish. In S. Schneider, J. Glikman & M. Avanzi (eds.), Parenthetical Verbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gürel, A. (2003). Is the Overt Pronoun Constraint Universal? Evidence from L2 Turkish. In Juana M. Liceras et al (eds) Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference, 130-139. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
Hornstein N. (2009). A Theory of Syntax. Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jackendoff, R. (1977). X’ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. MIT Press.
Jongsma, G. A. (2016). Prenominal ARCs in Japanese and Turkish: Less Appositive, more Adjectival? MA Thesis, University of Groningen.
Kamali, B. (2011). Topics at the PF Interface of Turkish. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University.
Kan, S. (2009). Prosodic Domains and the Syntax-prosody Mapping in Turkish. MA Thesis, Boğaziçi University.
Kayne, R. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kesici, E. (2013). Ki-Clauses in Turkish: A Paratactic Analysis. Coyote Papers 21. Tucson: University of Arizona Linguistics.
Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London: Routledge.
Liptak, A. (1998). On Restrictive versus Appositive Relative Clauses. Paper presented at the Conference Linguistics in the Netherlands, Utrecht.
Meral, H. M. (2004). Resumptive Pronouns in Turkish. MA. Thesis, Boğaziçi University.
Meral, H. M. (2006). English-Turkish Contrastive: Appositive Structures. Paper presented at IDEA Conference, April 2006. Boğaziçi University, Istanbul.
Meral, H. M. (2010). Resumption, A’-Chains and Implications on Clausal Architecture. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boğaziçi University.
Montalbetti, M. (1984). After Binding. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Özçelik, Ö. (to appear). An Antisymmetric Analysis of Turkish Relative Clauses: Implications from Prosody. Turkic Languages. Harrossowitz Verlag.
Platzack, C. (1997). A Representational Account of Restrictive and Non-restrictive Relatives: The Case of Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 59, 65–95.
Potts, C., (2005). The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prince, E. (1990). Syntax and Discourse: A Look at Resumptive Pronouns. In Hall, K., Koenig, J., Meacham, M., Reinman, S. and Sutton, L. (eds), Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 482–97. Berkeley, CA.
Rizzi, L. (1997). The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In A. Beletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 223-252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Safir, K. (1986). Relative Clauses in a Theory of Binding and Levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 663-689.
Selkirk, E. (2005). Comments on Intonational Phrasing. In: Frota, S., Vigario, M. and Freitas, M. (eds.), Prosodies, 11–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Smith, C. S. (1964). Determiners and Relative Clauses in a Generative Grammar of English. Language 40, 37–52.
Thompson, S. (1971). The Deep Structure of Relative Clauses. In Fillmore, C. and Langendoen, T. (eds), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, 78–94. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Vries, M. de. (2006). The Syntax of Appositive Relativization. On Specifying Coordination, False Free Relatives and Promotion. Linguistic Inquiry 37, 229-270.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Hasan Mesut Meral ^*
YILDIZ TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

28 Aralık 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Mayıs 2017

Kabul Tarihi

13 Mart 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.309847

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA58XU45ZY

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Meral, H. M. (2018). Appositive ki Clauses in Turkish. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 29(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.309847

Appositive ki Clauses in Turkish

Eşlemeli Ki Tümcecikleri

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Appositive ki Clauses in Turkish

Abstract

Keywords

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

Contact at the treetops: syntactic borrowing and syntactic complexity

TURKISH COUNTER-ASSERTIVE Kİ AS AN UTTERANCE-ORIENTED MARKER

EKLENTİ TÜMCECİKLERİNDEN EYLEM ARDI KONUMA YAPILAN ÇALKALAMALAR: YORUMLAMA VE İŞLEMLEME TEMELLİ BİR DEĞERLENDİRME