Native compounds in TİD: A classification based on headedness
Abstract
This
paper investigates the position of the structural head and its connection to
the semantic head in 127 compounds in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). To eliminate
language contact effects, we selected compounds that have monomorphemic
counterparts in Turkish. The findings are: (i) Endocentric compounds tend to be
head-final, (ii) Exocentric compounds tend to be head-initial, (iii) compound
internal order, in some well-defined cases, is affected by the lexical
semantics of one of the components. In addition, we identify two classes of
compounds, cranberry compounds and descriptive compounds, and finally, point to
the similarities between compound and phrase structure with respect to the head
parameter.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Ariel, M. (1991). The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(5), 443-463.
- Bauer, A. (2014). The use of signing space in a shared sign language of Australia. Boston/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, Lancaster: Ishara Press.
- Battison, R. M. (1978). Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
- Bisetto, A., & Scalise, S. (2005). The classification of compounds. Lingue e linguaggio, 4(2), 319-332.
- Booij, G. (2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford University Press.
- Brennan, M. (1990). Word Formation in British Sign Language. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
- Dikyuva, H., Zeshan, U. (2008). Türk İşaret Dili - Birinci seviye [Turkish Sign Language - Level One]. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
- Di Sciullo, A. M., & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word(Vol. 14). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
2 Temmuz 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi
14 Ekim 2017
Kabul Tarihi
8 Haziran 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2018 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1
Cited By
İşaret Dilinin Tarihi Serüveni ve Türk İşaret Dili
Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.876469
