Sesbilim-Sesbilgisi Arakesitinden Bir Örnek: Rotikler
Abstract
Keywords
References
- A petition. (1939). American Speech, 14(3), 206–208.
- Azevedo, M. M. (1981). A contrastive phonology of Portuguese and English. Georgetown University Press.
- Blaho, S. (2008). The syntax of phonology: A radically subtance-free approach [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. University of Tromsø.
- Boyce, S. E., Hamilton, S. M. ve Rivera-Campos, A. (2016). Acquiring rhoticity across languages: An ultrasound study of differentiating tongue movements. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 30(3-5), 174–201.
- Börtlü, G. (2020). The vowel triangle of Turkish and phonological processes of laxing and fronting in Turkish [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
- Câmara, J. M. (1972). The Portuguese language. University of Chicago Press.
- Capell, A. ve Hinch, H. E. (1970). Maung grammar: Texts and vocabulary. Mouton.
- Chabot, A. (2019). What’s wrong with being a rhotic? Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), Article 38, 1–24.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
Language Studies
Journal Section
Review Article
Authors
Göktuğ Börtlü
*
0000-0002-3042-4571
Türkiye
Publication Date
December 31, 2022
Submission Date
November 3, 2021
Acceptance Date
July 30, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 33 Number: 2
Cited By
SOCIOECONOMIC INFLUENCES ON TURKISH PRONUNCIATION: A SOCIOLINGUISTIC EXPLORATION OF THE RHOTIC 'R' SOUND
Uluslararası Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.37999/udekad.1723522
