Zihinsel Durumların Dilde ve Bilişte Temsili

Ercenur Ünal; Özge Baturlar

doi:10.18492/dad.676900

TR EN

Zihinsel Durumların Dilde ve Bilişte Temsili

Abstract

Başkalarının zihinsel durumlarını anlama becerisi okul öncesi çağlarda hızlı bir gelişim göstermektedir. Bu makalede dilin, kavramların çocukların zihinlerinde temsil edilişi ile ilişkisi ele alınmıştır. Bu ilişkiyi değerlendirebilmek için kişinin kendisinin ve başkalarının davranışlarına inanç, istek, niyet gibi zihinsel durumları atfetme becerileri (Theory of Mind) incelenmiştir. Özellikle dilin zihinsel durumların temsil edilmesinde gerekli olan kaynakları ne ölçüde sağladığı sorusuna odaklanılmıştır. Bu alandaki görgül bulgular dilin, zihinsel durumların temsilinde ve işlenmesinde kolaylaştırıcı bir araç görevi gördüğünü ancak zihinsel durumların temsili için bir zorunluluk olmadığını ortaya koymaktadır.

Keywords

zihin kuramı,yanlış inanç,yan cümlecik tümleci,dil-biliş etkileşimi,dil-düşünce ilişkisi

References

Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., Carroll, N., Hussain, S., & Humphreys, G. (2006b). Intact first- and second-order false belief reasoning in a patient with severely impaired grammer. Social Neuroscience, 1(3-4), 334–328. doi: 10.1080/17470910601038693
Appleton, M., & Reddy, V. (1996). Teaching three year-olds to pass false belief tests: A conversational approach. Social Development, 5(3), 275–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.1996.tb00086.x
Astington, J. W. (1996). What is theoretical about the child’s theory of mind?: A Vygotskian view of its development. In P. Curruthers, & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind (pp. 184–199). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Astington, J. W., & Gopnik, A. (1991). Theoretical explanations of children's understanding of mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 7-31. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1991.tb00859.x
Avis, J., & Harris, P.L. (1991). Belief-Desire Reasoning among Baka Children: Evidence for a Universal Conception of Mind. Child Development, 62(3), 460-467. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01544.x
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind?” Cognition, 21(1), 37–46. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
Barrett, H.C., Broesch, T., Scott, R. M., He, Z., Baillargeon, R., Wu, D., Bolz, M., Henrich, J., Setoh, P., Wang, J., Laurence, S. (2013). Early false-belief understanding in traditional non-Western societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 280(1755), 20122654. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2654
Bartsch, R., & Wellman, H. (1995). Children talk about the mind. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm. Cognition, 112(2), 337-342. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.006
Carruthers, P. (2002). The cognitive functions of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(6), 657-726. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X02000122
Clements, W. A., Rustin, C., & McCallum, S. (2000). Promoting the transition from implicit to explicit understanding: A training study of false belief. Developmental Science, 3(1), 88–92. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00102
Dungan, J., & Saxe, R. (2012). Matched false-belief performance during verbal and nonverbal interference. Cognitive Science, 36(6), 1148-1156. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01248.x
Flavell, J. H. (1988). The development of children's knowledge about the mind: From cognitive connections to mental representations. In J. W. Astington, P. L. Harris, & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Developing theories of mind (pp. 244-267). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108(3), 819-824. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.007
Frank, M. C., Fedorenko, E., Lai, P., Saxe, R., & Gibson, E. (2012). Verbal interference suppresses exact numerical representation. Cognitive Psychology, 64(1-2), 74-92. doi:10. 1016/j.cogpsych.2011.10.004
Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83(1), 49-79. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00166-4
Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gleitman, L. & Papafragou, A. (2005). Language and thought. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 633-661). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Gleitman, L. & Papafragou, A. (2012). New perspectives on language and thought. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (2nd edition) (pp.543-568). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hale, C. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2003). The influence of language on theory of mind: A training study. Development Science, 6(3), 346–359. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00289
Harris, P. (1996). Desires, beliefs, and language. In P. Carruthers & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Theories of Theories of Mind (pp. 283– 304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, P. (1999). Acquiring the act of conversation: Children’s developing conception of their conversational partner. In M. Bennett (Ed.), Developmental Psychology: Achievements and Prospects (pp. 89– 105). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Hermer-Vazquez L., Spelke E. S., & Katsnelson A. (1999). Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology, 39(1), 3-36. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0713
Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2016). Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs. Science, 354(6308), 110–114. doi: 10.1126/ science.aaf8110
Landau, B., Dessalegn, B., & Goldberg, A. M. (2010) Language and space: Momentary interactions. In P. Chilton & V. Evans (Eds.), Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions. Advances in Cognitive Linguistics Series (pp. 51-78). London, United Kingdom: Equinox Publishing.
Lecce, S., Bianco, F., Devine, R. T., Hughes, C., & Banerjee, R. (2014). Promoting theory of mind during middle childhood: A training program. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 52-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.03.002
Lecce, S., & Bianco, F. (2018). Working memory predicts changes in children’s theory of mind during middle childhood: A training study. Cognitive Development, 47, 71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.04.002
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in linguistic diversity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Li, P., Abarbanell, L., Gleitman, L., & Papafragou, A. (2011). Spatial reasoning in Tenejapan Mayans. Cognition, 120(1), 33-53. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.012
Li, P., Dunham, Y., & Carey, S. (2009). Of substance: The nature of language effects on entity construal. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 487-524. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.12.001
Li, P. & Gleitman, L. (2002). Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 83(3), 265-294. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00009-4
Liu, D., Wellman, H. M., Tardif, T., & Sabbagh, M. A. (2008). Theory of Mind development in Chinese children: A meta-analysis of false-belief understanding across cultures and languages. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 523-531. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.523
Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study. Child Development, 74(4), 1130–1144. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00597
Lupyan, G. (2016). The centrality of language in human cognition. Language Learning, 66(3), 516-553.
Newton, A. M., & de Villiers, J. G. (2007). Thinking while talking: Adults fail nonverbal false-belief reasoning. Psychological Science, 18(7), 574–579. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01942.x
Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308(5719), 255–258. doi: 10.1126/science.1107621
Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108(1), 155-184. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.007
Perner, J., Sprung, M., Zauner, P., & Haider, H. (2003). Want-that is understood well before think-that, say-that, and false belief: A test of de Villiers' linguistic determinism on German speaking children. Child Development, 74(1), 179-188. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00529
Peterson, C.C., & Siegal, M. (1999). Representing inner worlds: Theory of mind in autistic, deaf, and normal hearing children. Psychological Science, 10(2), 126– 9. doi: 10.1111/ 1467- 9280.00119
Pyers, J. E., & Senghas, A. (2009). Language promotes false-belief understanding: Evidence from learners of a new sign language. Psychological Science, 20(7), 805–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02377.x
Schick, B., de Villiers, P., de Villiers, J., & Hoffmeister, R. (2007). Language and theory of mind: A study of deaf children. Child Development, 78(2), 376–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01004.x
Siegal, M., Varley, R., & Want, S. (2001). Mind over grammar: Reasoning in aphasia and development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(7), 296–301. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01667-3
Slaughter, V., & Gopnik, A. (1996). Conceptual coherence in the child’s theory of mind: Training children to understand belief. Child Development, 67(6), 2767–2788. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01898.x
Southgate, V., Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by two-year olds. Psychological Science, 18(7), 587–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01944.x
Surian, L., Caldi, S., & Sperber, D. (2007). Attribution of beliefs to 13-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 18(7), 580–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01943.x
Tardif, T., & Wellman, H. M. (2000). Acquisition of mental state language in Mandarin- and Cantonese-speaking children. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 25-43. doi:10.J037//O012-1649.36.I.25
Tardif, T., Wellman, H. M., & Cheung, K. M. (2004). False belief understanding in Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 31(4), 779-800. doi: 10.1017/S0305000904006580
Tomasello, M. (2009). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Trueswell, J. C. & Papafragou, A. (2010). Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 64-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.006
Ünal, E., & Papafragou, A. (2016). Interactions between language and mental representations. Language Learning, 66(3), 554-580.doi: 10.1111/lang.12188
Ünal, E., Pinto, A., Bunger, A. & Papafragou, A. (2016). Monitoring sources of event memories: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 157-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.009
Varley, R., & Siegal, M. (2000). Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and ‘theory of mind’ in an agrammatic aphasic patient. Current Biology, 10(12), 723–726. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00538-8
Varley, R., Siegal, M., & Want, S. C. (2001). Severe impairment in grammar does not preclude theory of mind. Neurocase, 7(6), 489-493. doi: 10.1093/neucas/7.6.489
de Villiers, P. (2005). The role of language in theory-of-mind development: What deaf children tell us. In J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 266–297). New York: Oxford University Press.
de Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117(11), 1858-1878. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006
de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A.. (2000). Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs. In P. Mitchell & K. Riggs (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 189–226). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (2009). Complements Enable Representation of the Contents of False Beliefs: The Evolution of a Theory of Theory of Mind. In S. Foster-Cohen (Ed.), Language Acquisition (pp. 169–195). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9780230240780_8
Wellman, H. M. (1990). The child's theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wellman, H. M. (2014). Making Minds: How Theory of Mind Develops. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wellman, H.M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). A meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655-684. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00304

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Ercenur Ünal ^*
0000-0002-6794-2129
Türkiye

Özge Baturlar
0000-0001-6428-8953
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 28, 2020

Submission Date

January 18, 2020

Acceptance Date

May 17, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 31 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.676900

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA39NH78YG

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Ünal, E., & Baturlar, Ö. (2020). Zihinsel Durumların Dilde ve Bilişte Temsili. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 31(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.676900

AMA

1.Ünal E, Baturlar Ö. Zihinsel Durumların Dilde ve Bilişte Temsili. JLR. 2020;31(1):123-140. doi:10.18492/dad.676900

Chicago

Ünal, Ercenur, and Özge Baturlar. 2020. “Zihinsel Durumların Dilde Ve Bilişte Temsili”. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 31 (1): 123-40. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.676900.

EndNote

Ünal E, Baturlar Ö (June 1, 2020) Zihinsel Durumların Dilde ve Bilişte Temsili. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 31 1 123–140.

IEEE

[1]E. Ünal and Ö. Baturlar, “Zihinsel Durumların Dilde ve Bilişte Temsili”, JLR, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 123–140, June 2020, doi: 10.18492/dad.676900.

ISNAD

Ünal, Ercenur - Baturlar, Özge. “Zihinsel Durumların Dilde Ve Bilişte Temsili”. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 31/1 (June 1, 2020): 123-140. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.676900.

JAMA

1.Ünal E, Baturlar Ö. Zihinsel Durumların Dilde ve Bilişte Temsili. JLR. 2020;31:123–140.

MLA

Ünal, Ercenur, and Özge Baturlar. “Zihinsel Durumların Dilde Ve Bilişte Temsili”. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 31, no. 1, June 2020, pp. 123-40, doi:10.18492/dad.676900.

Vancouver

1.Ercenur Ünal, Özge Baturlar. Zihinsel Durumların Dilde ve Bilişte Temsili. JLR. 2020 Jun. 1;31(1):123-40. doi:10.18492/dad.676900

Cited By

Zihin Kuramı- İstek, Kanı, Bilgi, Duygu ve Yanlış Kanı Anlayışı- İle Dil İlişkisinin İncelenmesi

Dünya İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.55543/insan.1189311

Zihinsel Durumların Dilde ve Bilişte Temsili

Abstract

Keywords

Encoding Mental States in Language and Cognition

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Zihin Kuramı- İstek, Kanı, Bilgi, Duygu ve Yanlış Kanı Anlayışı- İle Dil İlişkisinin İncelenmesi