Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Sözdizim-Edimbilim Arakesitinde: Türkçe-İngilizce, Türkçe-Almanca ve Türkçe-Rusça İki Dilli Çocukların Türkçenin Sözcük Dizilimini Edinimi

Year 2021, Volume: 32 Issue: 3 - Acquisition of Turkish in monolingual and bilingual populations: Essays in honor of Hatice Sofu (Guest Editors: Feyza Altınkamış - Aslı Altan), 71 - 87, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.764149

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkçe-İngilizce, Türkçe-Almanca ve Türkçe-Rusça iki dilli çocukların Türkçe sözcük diziliminin sözdizimsel ve edimsel özelliklerini edinimlerini araştırmaktır. Çalışma verisi, İngiltere, Almanya ve Rusya'da doğan ve Türkçeyi miras dili olarak edinen iki dilli ve Türkçe tek dilli çocuklardan toplanmıştır. Araştırma bulguları, Türkçe tek dilli çocukların ÖNE dizilimini temel dizilim olarak benimsediklerini, ancak Türkçenin edimbilimsel özelliklerine de duyarlılık gösterdiklerini ve diğer sözcük dizilimlerini de küçük yaşlardan itibaren kullandıklarını ortaya koymaktadır. Türkçe-Almanca, Türkçe-İngilizce ve Türkçe-Rusça eş zamanlı iki dilli çocukların ise Türkçe tek dilli akranlarından farklı sözcük dizilim örüntüleri kullandıkları görülmüştür.

Supporting Institution

Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

Project Number

GAP-503-2018-3017

Thanks

Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Bilimsel Araştırmalar Koordinatörlüğü'ne bu çalışmanın gerçekleştirilmesi için verilen destek için teşekkür ederiz.

References

  • Altan, A. 2006. Acquisition of word order in Turkish. In Proceedings of 20th National Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Y. Çotuksöken and N. Yalçın (eds), 51-61. İstanbul: Maltepe University.
  • Comrie, B. (Ed.). (2009). The world's major languages. Routledge.
  • De Cat, C. (2009). Experimental evidence for preschoolers’ mastery of “topic”. Language Acquisition 16(4): 224-239.
  • Dixon, L. Q. (2011). The role of home and school factors in predicting English vocabulary among bilingual kindergarten children in Singapore. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(1), 141-168.
  • Dmitrievna Kallestinova, E. (2007). Aspects of word order in Russian. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Iowa.
  • Dyakonova, M. (2004). Information structure development: Evidence from the acquisition of word order in Russian and English. Nordlyd. 32, 88-109.
  • Ekmekçi, Ö. (1986). Significance of word order in the acquisition of Turkish. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics, D. Slobin and K. Zimmer (eds), 265-272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Erguvanlı, E. (1984). The Function of Word Order in Turkish Grammar. California: University of California Press.
  • Göksel, A. and Özsoy, A. S. (2000). Is there a focus position in Turkish?, In Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages; Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, A. Göksel and C. Kerslake (eds), 219-228. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

At the Syntax-Pragmatics Interface: Acquisition of Turkish Word Order by Turkish-English, Turkish-German and Turkish-Russian Bilingual Children

Year 2021, Volume: 32 Issue: 3 - Acquisition of Turkish in monolingual and bilingual populations: Essays in honor of Hatice Sofu (Guest Editors: Feyza Altınkamış - Aslı Altan), 71 - 87, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.764149

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate how syntactic and pragmatic features of Turkish word order are acquired by Turkish-English, Turkish-German and Turkish-Russian bilingual children. The data were collected from Turkish monolingual and bilingual children who were born in England, Germany and Russia and acquired Turkish as their heritage language. The findings of the study reveal that the Turkish monolingual children adopt the use of SOV order as canonical, but they also show sensitivity to the pragmatics of Turkish and use other orders from an early age. Turkish-German, Turkish-English and Turkish-Russian simultaneous bilingual children, on the other hand, showed different patterns of word order acquisition than their Turkish monolingual counterparts. 

Project Number

GAP-503-2018-3017

References

  • Altan, A. 2006. Acquisition of word order in Turkish. In Proceedings of 20th National Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Y. Çotuksöken and N. Yalçın (eds), 51-61. İstanbul: Maltepe University.
  • Comrie, B. (Ed.). (2009). The world's major languages. Routledge.
  • De Cat, C. (2009). Experimental evidence for preschoolers’ mastery of “topic”. Language Acquisition 16(4): 224-239.
  • Dixon, L. Q. (2011). The role of home and school factors in predicting English vocabulary among bilingual kindergarten children in Singapore. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(1), 141-168.
  • Dmitrievna Kallestinova, E. (2007). Aspects of word order in Russian. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Iowa.
  • Dyakonova, M. (2004). Information structure development: Evidence from the acquisition of word order in Russian and English. Nordlyd. 32, 88-109.
  • Ekmekçi, Ö. (1986). Significance of word order in the acquisition of Turkish. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics, D. Slobin and K. Zimmer (eds), 265-272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Erguvanlı, E. (1984). The Function of Word Order in Turkish Grammar. California: University of California Press.
  • Göksel, A. and Özsoy, A. S. (2000). Is there a focus position in Turkish?, In Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages; Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, A. Göksel and C. Kerslake (eds), 219-228. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
There are 9 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Çiğdem Sağın Şimşek

Elena Antonova Ünlü

Project Number GAP-503-2018-3017
Publication Date December 31, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021Volume: 32 Issue: 3 - Acquisition of Turkish in monolingual and bilingual populations: Essays in honor of Hatice Sofu (Guest Editors: Feyza Altınkamış - Aslı Altan)

Cite

APA Sağın Şimşek, Ç., & Antonova Ünlü, E. (2021). At the Syntax-Pragmatics Interface: Acquisition of Turkish Word Order by Turkish-English, Turkish-German and Turkish-Russian Bilingual Children. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 32(3), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.764149