Birleşik Sözcüklerin İşlemlenmesi: İki Kök Sözcükten Oluşan Birleşik Sözcüklerin Durumu

Hatice Şanlı; Serkan Uygun

doi:10.18492/dad.1774303

EN TR

Morphological Processing of Turkish Compound Words: The Case of Compounds Formed by Two Root Words

Öz

This study investigates how morphologically complex compound words in Turkish are processed in real time by monolingual Turkish speakers. To this end, compound words that are in their root forms are categorized as either semantically transparent (e.g., babaanne [grandmother]) or semantically opaque (e.g., karakol [police station]), and the effect of semantic transparency on morphological processing is examined. In the lexical decision task conducted with a masked priming experiment, the response times to the constituents of compound words are analyzed to determine whether these words are processed through morphological decomposition or full-listing. The findings indicate that semantic transparency has no effect when the non-head constituents serve as the target words, suggesting that both transparent and opaque compounds are processed through morphological decomposition. On the other hand, when the head constituents function as the target words, semantic transparency is found to influence the processing pattern and lead to the use of different processing models. These results demonstrate that there is a crucial relationship between semantic transparency and the head constituent in the processing of compound words and that this relationship can alter the processing pattern.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Birleşik Sözcüklerin İşlemlenmesi: İki Kök Sözcükten Oluşan Birleşik Sözcüklerin Durumu

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkçede biçimbilimsel olarak karmaşık yapıya sahip birleşik sözcüklerin anadili Türkçe olan tek dilli konuşucular tarafından gerçek zamanlı olarak nasıl işlemlendiğini incelemektedir. Bu amaçla, kök haldeki birleşik sözcükler anlamsal olarak geçirimli (ör. babaanne) ve geçirimsiz (ör. karakol) olarak ikiye ayrılıp anlamsal geçirimliliğin biçimbilimsel işlemleme üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmaktadır. Maskelenmiş hazırlama yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilen sözcük tanıma testinde, birleşik sözcüklerin bileşenlerine verilen sözcük tanıma süreleri analiz edilerek bu sözcüklerin biçimbirimsel ayrıştırma mı yoksa bütünsel listeleme yoluyla mı işlemlendiği sorgulanmıştır. Bulgular; anlamsal olarak geçirimliliğin baş olmayan sözcükler hedef sözcük olduğunda herhangi bir etkisinin olmadığını, yani geçirimli ve geçirimsiz birleşik sözcüklerin biçimbirim bileşenlerine ayrıştırılarak işlemlendiğini göstermektedir. Öte yandan baş sözcüklerin hedef sözcük olarak kullanıldığı durumlarda ise anlamsal geçirimliliğin işlemleme örüntüsünü etkileyip farklı işlemleme modellerinin kullanılmasına neden olduğu bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlar, birleşik sözcüklerin işlemlenmesinde anlamsal geçirimlilik ile baş sözcük arasında önemli bir ilişki olduğunu ve bu ilişkinin işlemleme örüntüsünü değiştirebildiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etik Beyan

Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulundan 31.10.2024 tarihli ve E-85646034-604.01-92148 sayılı etik kurul onayı alınmıştır. Katılımcılar araştırma hakkında bilgilendirilmiş ve katılımcılardan bilgilendirilmiş onam alınmıştır.

Kaynakça

Aksu-Koç, A. (1994). Türkçede zaman, kip, durum ve görünüşün çocuklar tarafından edinimi. TÜBİTAK.
Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press.
Andrews, S., Vigliocco, G., & Avrutin, S. (2004). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. Memory & Cognition, 32(2), 244-255. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196862
Arcara, G., Semenza, C., & Bambini, V. (2014). Word structure and decomposition effects in reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1-2), 184-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2014.903915
Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. MIT Press.
Aslan, E., & Altan, A. (2006). The role of -(s)I in Turkish indefinite nominal compounds. Dil Dergisi, 131, 57-78. https://doi.org/10.1501/Dilder_0000000049
Baayen, R. H., Lieber, R., & Schreuder, R. (1997). The lexical representation of compounds. In M. Walsh Dickey & S. Tunstall (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 27-39). Berkeley Linguistics Society. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v21i1.1412

Babayiğit, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2007). Preliterate phonological awareness and early literacy skills in Turkish. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(4), 394-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00350.x
Banguoğlu, T. (1998). Türkçenin grameri (13. baskı). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. (2013). Random-effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bauer, L. (1993). Manual of information to accompany the Wellington corpus of written New Zealand English. Department of Linguistics, Victoria University of Wellington.
Bauer, L. (1998). When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English? English Language & Linguistics, 2(1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674300000691
Bauer, L. (2003). Introducing linguistic morphology (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.
Bauer, L. (2006). Compounds and compounding. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 719-726). Elsevier. 10.1515/flin-2019-2010
Beyersmann, E., Kezilas, Y., Coltheart, M., Castles, A., Ziegler, J. C., Taft, M., & Grainger, J. (2018). Taking the Book from the Bookshelf: Masked Constituent Priming Effects from Compound Words and Nonwords. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.11
Booij, G. (2010). Construction morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(7), 543-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00213.x
Booij, G. (2012). The grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic morphology (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bradley, D. C. (1979). Lexical representation of derivational relation [Published Doctoral dissertation]. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Bronk, E., Kireev, M., & Lemhöfer, K. (2018). Semantic transparency and constituent frequency in compound word processing: An ERP study. SAGE Open, 8(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018809282
Burani, C., & Thornton, A. M. (2003). Investigating morphology in children with the reading of derived words: Effects of lexical transparency and morphological structure. Reading and Writing, 16(6), 493-517. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025529023516
Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 2. Development, writing, and other language processes (pp. 257-294). Academic Press.
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28(3), 297-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0
Dede, M. (1978). Türkçede isim tamlamaları. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı – Belleten, 26, 139-157.
Delahunty, G., & Garvey, J. (2010). The English language: From sound to sense. Parlor Press. 10.37514/PER-B.2010.2331
Doğan, F. Ş. (2013). Comprehension of compound nouns by Turkish speaking pre school children. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8/12, 403-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.5725
Donalies, E. (2004). Wortbildung des Deutschen: Eine Einführung in die Grundlagen (2.Aufl.). Narr.
Dressler, W. U. (2005). Word-formation in natural morphology. In P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp. 267-284). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_11
Dressler, W. U. (2006). Compound types. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 23-44). Oxford University Press.
Durgunoğlu, A.Y. (2003). Recognizing morphologically complex words in Turkish. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words. Neuropsychology and cognition (pp. 81-92). Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3720-2_4
Durgunoğlu, A.Y., & Öney, B. (1999). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition. Reading and Writing, 11, 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008093232622
Erguvanlı-Taylan, E. (1996). The parameter of aspect in Turkish. In A Konrot (Ed.), Modern studies in Turkish linguistics: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Turkish linguistics. (pp. 153-168). Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Feldman, L. B., Soltano, E. G., Pastizzo, M. J., & Francis, S. E. (2009). What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing? Brain and Language, 108(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.10.004
Fiorentino, R. (2006). Morphological composition in visual word recognition. [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Maryland.
Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(7), 953-1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701190215
Fiorentino, R., & Fund-Reznicek, E. (2009). Masked morphological priming in compound words: Constituent priming and lexical status. The Mental Lexicon, 4(2), 159-193. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.4.2.01fio
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680-698. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680
Frauenfelder, U. H., & Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. E. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991 (pp. 165-183). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2516-1_10
Friederici, A. D. (1985). Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line processing in normals and agrammatics. Cognition, 19(2), 133-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90004-4
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2007). An introduction to language (8th ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
Gacan, E. (2014). The processing of derivational morphology in L1 and L2 Turkish: A masked priming study [Master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2009). Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.003
Göksel, A. (2009). Compounds in Turkish. Lingue e Linguaggio, 8(2), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.1418/30928
Göksel, A., & Kerslake, C. (2005). Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge.
Göksel, A., & Haznedar, B. (2007). Remarks on compounding in Turkish. In MorboComp Project Working Papers. Bologna University.
Hankamer, J. (1989). Morphological parsing and the lexicon. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 392-408). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4213.003.0018
Hinojosa, J. A., Martín-Loeches, M., & Rubia, F. J. (2001). Event-related potentials and lexical decision task: Word frequency vs. word concreteness. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 41(2), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00181-8
Isel, F., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Prosody-assisted head-driven access to spoken German compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.277
Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G. (1999). Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 68(1–2), 362-369. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2088
Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 406-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.003
Juhasz, B. J. (2006). The influence of semantic transparency on eye movements during English compound word recognition. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 297-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50018-5
Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions, and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661903
Kabak, B. (2007). Turkish. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, & S. Skopeteas (Eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation (Vol. 2, pp. 1520-1530). De Gruyter.
Kabak, B., & Vogel, I. (2001). The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology, 18(3), 315-360. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675701004201
Karacaoğlu, M. Ö. (2010). Birleşik kelimelerin yazımı. [Master’s thesis]. Marmara University
Katamba, F. (1993). Morphology. London: Macmillan.
Kırkıcı, B. (2009). İmparator çizelgesi vs. imparatorlar çizelgesi: On the (non)-use of plural non-head nouns in Turkish nominal compounding. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1, 35-53.
Kırkıcı, B., & Clahsen, H. (2013). Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 301-322. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000648
Kim, S. Y., Yap, M. J., & Goh, W. D. (2019). The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2722–2732. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1143-3
Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London: Routledge.
Kunduracı, A. (2015). Türkçede aitlik ulamı ve biçimsel ifadesi. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 26(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.18492/da.55763
Kuznetsova, A., Bruun Brockhoff, P., & Bojesen Christensen, R. H. (2014). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package) (Version 2.0-11) [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html
Lau, D., Liang, Y., & Leung, M. (2017). Relations between awareness of morphosyntactic structures in chinese compound words and reading abilities: a short report. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 31(7-9), 631-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2017.1302513
Li, M., Jiang, N., & Gor, K. (2017). L1 and L2 processing of compound words: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 384-402. https://doi:10.1017/S1366728915000681
Libben, G. (1994). How is morphological decomposition achieved? Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 369-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402124
Libben, G. (1998). Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment. Brain and Language, 61(1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1876
Libben, G. (2006). Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1-22). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228911.003.0001
Libben, G. (2010). Compound words, semantic transparency, and morphological transcendence. New impulses in word-formation, 317-330.
Libben, G., & Jarema, G. (2006). Compounding as a window into the architecture of the mental lexicon. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1-27). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228911.001.0001
Libben, G., Derwing, B. L., & de Almeida, R. G. (2003a). Compounding as a unique phenomenon in language processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 271-279.
Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003b). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84(1), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5
Lieber, R., & Štekauer, P. (2009). The Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Longtin, C.-M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008
Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 644-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.003
Marelli, M., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2017). Compounding as abstract operation in semantic space: Investigating relational effects through a large-scale, data-driven computational model. Cognition, 166, 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.026
Marelli, M., Aggujaro, S., Molteni, F., & Luzzatti, C. (2013). Understanding the mental lexicon through neglect dyslexia: a study on compound noun reading. Neurocase, 19(2), 128-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2011.654222
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940-967. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Morphology, language and the brain: The decompositional substrate for language comprehension. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 823-836. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2091
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3
Morris, J., & Stockall, L. (2012). Early abstract morphological decomposition: Evidence from masked priming and magnetoencephalography. Brain and Language, 123(2), 81-93.
Münte, T. F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1999). Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 7(3), 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00028-7
Oğuz, E., & Kırkıcı, B. (2023). The processing of morphologically complex words by developing readers of Turkish: A masked priming study. Reading and Writing, 36, 2053-2080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10377-0
Öney, B., & Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640000984X
Özer, S. (2010). Morphological priming in Turkish nominal compound processing [Master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
Plag, I. (2003). Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 253-279.
R Core Team (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Sürüm 4.2.2). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 942-971. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802069730
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 507-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689
Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510
Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A(3), 529-567. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749008401236
Scalise, S., & Fábregas, A. (2010). The head in compounding. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 177-200). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1075/cilt.311.10sca
Scalise, S., & Vogel, I. (2010). Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schäfer, M. (2018). The semantics of English noun-noun compounds. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/153
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
Semenza, C., & Luzzatti, C. (2014). Combining words in the brain: The processing of compound words: Introduction to the special issue. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1-2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2014.898922
Sezer, T. (2017). TS corpus project: An online Turkish dictionary and TS DIY corpus. European Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 9(1), 18-24.
Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S., & Clahsen, H. (1999). Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 68(1–2), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00033-5
Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90219-6
Stathis, A. (2014). How partial transparency influences the processing of compound words? [Master’s thesis]. University of Windsor.
Şenel, M. (2009). Kes-kopyala-yapıştır; Yeni kelime türet. Türk Araştırma Yıllığı – Belleten, 57(2009-1), 99-110. https://izlik.org/JA56UG65JA
Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effects. Memory and Cognition, 7(4), 263-272.
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 745-765. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 638-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(6), 607-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2
Uygun, S., & Gürel, A. (2017). Türkçe birleşik sözcüklerin biçimbirimsel olarak işlemlenmesi. İçinde B. Makaroğlu, İ. P. Bekar, & E. Arıca Akkök (Yay. haz.), 30. Ulusal Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri (ss. 139-145). Dilbilim Derneği Yayınları.
Uygun, S., & Clahsen, H. (2021). Morphological processing in heritage speakers: A masked priming study on the Turkish aorist. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(3), 415-426. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000577
Vannest, J., & Boland, J. E. (1999). Lexical morphology and lexical access. Brain and Language, 68(1–2), 324-332. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2114
Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S. New York: Springer.
Yükseker, H. (1987). The syntax of compounds in Turkish. Studies in Turkish Linguistics, 33-45.
Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 341-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402123

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Çocuğun Dil Edinimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Hatice Şanlı ^*
0000-0002-0456-9152
Türkiye

Serkan Uygun
0000-0002-0880-9280
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Haziran 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

30 Ağustos 2025

Kabul Tarihi

2 Mart 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.1774303

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA52TC59GR

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Şanlı, H., & Uygun, S. (2026). Birleşik Sözcüklerin İşlemlenmesi: İki Kök Sözcükten Oluşan Birleşik Sözcüklerin Durumu. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 37(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.1774303

AMA

1.Şanlı H, Uygun S. Birleşik Sözcüklerin İşlemlenmesi: İki Kök Sözcükten Oluşan Birleşik Sözcüklerin Durumu. JLR. 2026;37(1):1-37. doi:10.18492/dad.1774303

Chicago

Şanlı, Hatice, ve Serkan Uygun. 2026. “Birleşik Sözcüklerin İşlemlenmesi: İki Kök Sözcükten Oluşan Birleşik Sözcüklerin Durumu”. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 37 (1): 1-37. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.1774303.

EndNote

Şanlı H, Uygun S (01 Haziran 2026) Birleşik Sözcüklerin İşlemlenmesi: İki Kök Sözcükten Oluşan Birleşik Sözcüklerin Durumu. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 37 1 1–37.

IEEE

[1]H. Şanlı ve S. Uygun, “Birleşik Sözcüklerin İşlemlenmesi: İki Kök Sözcükten Oluşan Birleşik Sözcüklerin Durumu”, JLR, c. 37, sy 1, ss. 1–37, Haz. 2026, doi: 10.18492/dad.1774303.

ISNAD

Şanlı, Hatice - Uygun, Serkan. “Birleşik Sözcüklerin İşlemlenmesi: İki Kök Sözcükten Oluşan Birleşik Sözcüklerin Durumu”. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 37/1 (01 Haziran 2026): 1-37. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.1774303.

JAMA

1.Şanlı H, Uygun S. Birleşik Sözcüklerin İşlemlenmesi: İki Kök Sözcükten Oluşan Birleşik Sözcüklerin Durumu. JLR. 2026;37:1–37.

MLA

Şanlı, Hatice, ve Serkan Uygun. “Birleşik Sözcüklerin İşlemlenmesi: İki Kök Sözcükten Oluşan Birleşik Sözcüklerin Durumu”. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 37, sy 1, Haziran 2026, ss. 1-37, doi:10.18492/dad.1774303.

Vancouver

1.Hatice Şanlı, Serkan Uygun. Birleşik Sözcüklerin İşlemlenmesi: İki Kök Sözcükten Oluşan Birleşik Sözcüklerin Durumu. JLR. 01 Haziran 2026;37(1):1-37. doi:10.18492/dad.1774303